It is over 40 years since Ceadel defined interwar British
pacifism as a ‘faith’. During that time, pacifism has had little\ud
political significance and the influential peace movement of
the interwar years is now scarcely within living memory.
Yet, what Margaret Thatcher once described as ‘the peace
studies problem’ is a diverse and interdisciplinary field, and
one in which scholarship, peace activism and mainstream
politics are all closely intertwined. Feminist scholars and
peace activists have queried the links between militarism
and patriarchy; historians and ethicists have explored
medical pacifism and have asked whether medicine is (or
should be) a pacifist profession. More recently, scholars
have looked at interwar pacifism through the lens of the
Empire and have challenged the imperialist pacifist delu�sion. Despite pacifism's limited political influence, its his�tory over the last 40 years has explored the beliefs and
motivations of men and women struggling to respond to
militarism and the threat of war
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.