This thesis traces the mariner’s oceanic experience in the journals of the voyages of Pacific
exploration made between 1764 and 1780 by John Byron, Samuel Wallis, Philip Carteret and
James Cook and the published narratives that derived from them. Situated within the
emerging field of ‘blue humanities’, the thesis focuses on the account of the ocean and
engages with problems of defining and describing the ocean. It examines how the mariners
articulated their oceanic experience and how their narrative challenged wider cultural
assumptions about the ocean and how it was then absorbed into literary narratives. It argues
that the journals of Pacific exploration increasingly emphasized the experience of being at sea
and, through the adaptation of that narrative in the texts that followed, were part of a larger
shift in the depiction of the ocean.
John Hawkesworth’s official adaptation of the first journals published in 1773 involved a
process of ‘un-seaing’ by which, to suit literary pre-conceptions, the ocean was marginalised
in favour of a renewed focus on landfalls. The adaptations that followed responded to a
variety of audiences. Some continued to ‘un-sea’ the texts and focussed on terrestrial
encounters. These transferred the “other” of the ocean to the societies found there, part of a
developing narrative of colonization. However others, designed to appeal to the more
‘middling-sort’ of reader who might identify with the professionalised accounts the mariners
had provided, reengaged with the maritime narrative of the original journals. Here the
description of the oceanic experience was revitalised. Thus, the thesis argues, the journals
found a place in the literary discourse of the voyage and helped shape a larger understanding
of the ocean that challenged its uncertainty and put the mariner’s oceanic experience at its
centre
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.