PhD ThesisForeign Direct Investment (FDI) has become a ‘mantra’ for developing countries, as not only
is it a source of capital to boost economic development, but an important source of employment
and technology. Many developing countries provide incentives to attract foreign investors, such
as preferential taxes, but the evidence for these is mixed. Some find they are important, but
others that they do not affect FDI location. Indonesia is of interest, since it is a large and rapidly
developing Asian economy, which has pursued a policy of ‘openness’ towards FDI. This is
supported by a programme of taxes and other incentives, but despite using these measures for
more than fifty years their effect is uncertain, and they remain controversial.
The purpose of this thesis is to analyse the characteristics of FDI location in Indonesia and to
explore the role of tax and other incentives. Overall, the thesis makes three main contributions.
First, it provides an up-to-date analysis of FDI location in Indonesia using an original dataset
and covering the ‘New Order’ period from the mid-1990s. Second, it undertakes a large-scale
questionnaire survey of foreign-owned plants in Indonesia to establish their nature and motive
for location. Third, the thesis carries out face-to-face interviews with Indonesian policymakers
at a high-level to explore the rationale for inward investment and tax incentive policies.
Inward FDI to Indonesia has grown steadily over the last decade, and it is now about US$20
billion per annum. This represents about 2.1% of Indonesian GDP, while comparable domestic
investment is about two-thirds smaller, indicating its importance. Making use of realization
data provided by the Indonesian Investment Coordinating Board, the thesis shows that the vast
majority of FDI in Indonesia is located on Java, the most populous region, and reflects market
and labour resource-seeking. Regions outside Java are important more recently and are a target
for FDI in mining and agriculture, especially from Europe and America. However, most FDI
is from Asia, especially Singapore and Japan. The manufacturing share of FDI has increased
over time, although the mean project size is smaller. The thesis finds a sharp division between
the Special Areas, in which the incentives are applied intensively, as FDI seeks labour resources
and exports, whereas outside these areas it supplies the domestic market.
The survey shows that tax incentives are not the main factor for influencing investors’ decisions
to locate in Indonesia. Thus, while investors include these incentives in their appraisal, they
tend not to be the critical factor for investment in Indonesia. This seems to be well-perceived
xvi
by policymakers, so that political economy considerations are important for the continuance of
these incentives. Other developing countries offer these incentives, so that the expectation of
investors and policymakers is that these subsidies will also be available in Indonesia. Further,
the tax incentives have largely evaded scrutiny, and the location of FDI has been attributed to
other factors. Finally, by being seen to ‘do something’ to attract FDI in a fairly minimal way,
the tax incentives are a means by which the government garners political support.The government of
Indonesia, which sponsored my PhD study through the Indonesia Endowment Fund for
Education (LPDP
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.