Northern Plains Resource Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Abstract
Environmental activist and indigenous rights groups have challenged the validity of the Keystone XL Pipeline since its initial approval in 2010. In April 2020, less than a month after crews broke ground, the opposing groups notched a major win when the United States District Court for the District of Montana revoked a key permit for the project on the grounds that the United States Army Corps of Engineers had inadequately assessed the pipeline’s impact on endangered species- text
- fish and wildlife service
- army corps of engineers
- northern plains resource council
- pipeline
- oil & gas
- endangered species act
- clean water act
- administrative procedure act
- national environmental policy act
- keystone xl
- Administrative Law
- Animal Law
- Energy and Utilities Law
- Environmental Law
- Land Use Law
- Natural Resources Law
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
- Water Law