Through a deep analysis of doctrine and jurisprudence, the work investigates the various issues raised over the years in relation to the process of repression of anti-union conduct, as regulated by art. 28 of the Workers’ Statute. In this sense, it analyzes questions regarding the purpose and object of proceedings, the “teleological” notion of anti-union conduct and the presuppositions for action, active legal capacity and interest in standing, legitimation to be made a defendant, interlocutory phase and opposition phase, in cases of repression of anti-union conduct within public administration.Through a deep analysis of doctrine and jurisprudence, the work investigates the various issues raised over the years in relation to the process of repression of anti-union conduct, as regulated by art. 28 of the Workers’ Statute. In this sense, it analyzes questions regarding the purpose and object of proceedings, the “teleological” notion of anti-union conduct and the presuppositions for action, active legal capacity and interest in standing, legitimation to be made a defendant, interlocutory phase and opposition phase, in cases of repression of anti-union conduct within public administration.Monograph's chapter
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.