Location of Repository

The 'self-service' student: building enterprise-wide systems into universities

By N. Pollock

Abstract

This article investigates the take-up by universities of enterprise-wide\ud computer systems and the development of a new module for the management and\ud administration of students. Having its origins in Electronic Commerce, the system assumes\ud the existence of a certain kind of user, one with particular roles and responsibilities – a\ud self-service user. The notion of ‘self-service’ is deployed as an integral part of the system\ud rollout where students are to view, input and modify administrative and financial\ud information on themselves and their courses. Drawing from the sociology of science and\ud technology, and material from a three-year ethnographic study, we describe the system’s\ud implementation in a British university. While accepting of the need for an ERP system the\ud campus community reject self-service. However, as we will show, because Campus\ud Management is a ‘global product’ unwanted functionality can be difficult to resist outright\ud and this can have important implications for the autonomy of the university and the\ud reshaping of fundamental principles and relationships

Topics: Economics
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0810902032000051045
OAI identifier: oai:www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk:1842/3254
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1995). A case study of mass information systems’, doi
  2. After Industrial Society? The Emerging Self-Service doi
  3. (1998). Building a self-service culture that works’,
  4. (2000). Comment made by a speaker at a recent conference on self-service technologies.
  5. (1991). Critical Theory of Technology, doi
  6. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, doi
  7. ERP systems have a complex history which has seen their initial development in one context with one set of users in mind (manufacturing) and constant re-development in light of theThe
  8. (2000). Exploding the self-service myth’,
  9. (1995). For a description of the ‘crisis’ doi
  10. (1987). For a discussion of this in relation to universities, see
  11. (2003). For a review of some of the claims made concerning the application of new ICTs to universities
  12. From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise: the changing cultures of universities’,
  13. (1999). Higher education in the 21st century: some possible futures’, Discussion Paper, doi
  14. (1976). Karl Weick makes a similar argument, see ‘Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, doi
  15. (2002). Learning as cultural practice’, in
  16. (1999). Managing Students,
  17. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system’, doi
  18. (2000). Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity,
  19. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, doi
  20. See also several of the papers
  21. (1997). Students: Changing Roles, Changing Lives, doi
  22. Such temporal strategies are relatively common in universities, see Lockwood and Davies,
  23. (1998). The academy in a wired world’, doi
  24. (1992). The commodification of industry applications software’, doi
  25. (2000). The conference attended was the ‘Process Improvement Programme
  26. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects’,
  27. (1994). The idea behind this initiative was to attempt to ‘standardise’ the way in which universities collected and reported information upwards to bodies like the Higher Education Statistics Agency and to government sponsors; see
  28. (2002). The theory & practice of the virtual university: working through the work of making work mobile’,
  29. (2000). The virtual university as “timely and accurate information”’, doi
  30. (2002). There are, of course, a few exceptions and certain authors do attempt to provide a more sophisticated understanding of technology. See for example
  31. (2000). This argument is most forcefully made in James Cornford’s article ‘The virtual university is the university made concrete’,
  32. This is drawn from Andrew Feenberg’s description of environmentalist constructions of nature, op. cit.,
  33. (2000). This view can also be found in documents describing the rationale of the project; see ‘University portal gives students direct access’, http://s3.livjm.ac.uk/document/jtapol.htm, downloaded 15
  34. (1994). Universities and Communities,
  35. (1985). Universities as organizations’, in

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.