Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

On the comparison of proof planning systems: Lambda-clam, Omega and IsaPlanner

By Louise Abigail Dennis, Mateja Jamnik and Martin Pollet


We present a framework for describing proof planners. This framework is based around a decomposition of proof planners into planning states, proof language, proof plans, proof methods, proof revision, proof control and planning algorithms. We use this framework to motivate the comparison of three recent proof planning systems, lclam, OMEGA and IsaPlanner, and demonstrate how the framework allows us to discuss and illustrate both their similarities and differences in a consistent fashion. This analysis reveals that proof control and the use of contextual information in planning states are key areas in need of further investigation

Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2005
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A critique of proof planning.
  2. (2003). Certifying solutions to permutation group problems.
  3. (2002). Comparing approaches to the exploration of the domain of residue classes.
  4. (1994). Isabelle: A generic theorem prover.
  5. (2003). IsaPlanner: A prototype proof planner
  6. (1999). Knowledge-based proof planning.
  7. (2002). Proof development with ‚Ą¶mega.
  8. (1998). System description: proof planning in higher-order logic with lambdaclam.
  9. (2001). The Automation of Proof by Mathematical Induction.
  10. (1988). The use of explicit plans to guide inductive proofs.
  11. (1992). The use of planning critics in mechanizing inductive Proofs.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.