Location of Repository

To join or not to join? Factors influencing employee share plan membership in a multinational corporation

By Alex Bryson and Richard B. Freeman

Abstract

Many firms encourage employees to own company stock through share plans that subsidizethe price at favorable rates, but even so many employees do not buy shares. Using a newsurvey of employees in a multinational with a share ownership plan, we find considerablevariation in joining among observationally equivalent workers and explore the reasons for thevariation. Participation in the plan is higher the greater the potential pay-off from joining theshare plan, which indicates that rational economic calculations affect the decision to join. Butthere is also evidence that psychological factors affect the decision to join. Some nonmemberssay they intend to join in the future, which means they forgo the benefits ofimmediate membership. The proportion of workers who purchase shares varies acrossworkplaces beyond what we predict from worker characteristics. This suggests that coworkerbehavior influences decisions. Indeed, workers say that they pay most attention toother workers and little attention to company HR management in their decision on joining

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:48915
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2003). Buying Into Union Membership’,
  2. (1996). Crime and Social Interactions’, doi
  3. (2008). Does Employee Ignorance Undermine Shared Capitalism?, doi
  4. (2005). Employee Share Ownership and Profit Sharing in the European Union, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. doi
  5. (2004). Employee Stock Purchase Plans, doi
  6. (2009). European Federation of Employee Share Ownership
  7. (2001). Housing Subsidies and Work Incentives in doi
  8. (2010). How Does Shared Capitalism Affect Economic Performance in the UK?’, doi
  9. (1993). Identification of Exogenous Social Effects: the Reflection Problem’, doi
  10. (2005). Identity and the Economics of Organizations’, doi
  11. (2005). Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Representative, Experimentally-validated Survey,
  12. (2002). Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: the influence of colleagues’ choices’, doi
  13. (1998). Psychology and Economics’, doi
  14. (2010). Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing and Broad-based Stock Options, doi
  15. (2010). Shared Capitalism in the US Economy: Prevalence, Characteristics and Employee Views of Financial Participation in Enterprises’, doi
  16. (2009). The Changing Use of Contingent Pay at the Modern British Workplace’,
  17. (2000). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia doi
  18. (2005). Why Do some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees? An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.