Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do oil windfalls improve living standards?: evidence from Brazil

By Francesco Caselli and Guy Michaels


We use variation in oil output among Brazilian municipalities to investigate the effects of resource windfalls. We find muted effects of oil through market channels: offshore oil has no effect on municipal non-oil GDP or its composition, while onshore oil has only modest effects on non-oil GDP composition. However, oil abundance causes municipal revenues and reported spending on a range of budgetary items to increase, mainly as a result of royalties paid by Petrobras. Nevertheless, surveybased measures of social transfers, public good provision, infrastructure, and household income increase less (if at all) than one might expect given the increase in reported spending. To explain why oil windfalls contribute little to local living standards, we use data from the Brazilian media and federal police to document that very large oil output increases alleged instances of illegal activities associated with mayors

Topics: F1201 Latin America (General), HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2008a): “Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes,” forthcoming, doi
  2. (2008b): “Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments,” doi
  3. (2006). A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, doi
  4. (1998). A predictive index for the flypaper effect. doi
  5. (2008). Aid and Growth: What Does the CrossCountry Evidence Really Show?” doi
  6. (1992). Aid and the Dutch Disease: Macroeconomic Management when Everybody Loves You. doi
  7. (2005). Analise do impacto social de receitas provenientes de royalties do petroleo em municipios do estado da Bahia. Master’s thesis, Universidade de Brasilia.
  8. (1995). Anomalies: The Flypaper Effect,” doi
  9. Assuncao (2007): “Rent Seeking and the Unveiling of 'De Facto' Institutions: Development and Colonial Heritage within Brazil,” doi
  10. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. doi
  11. (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?” American Economic Review, doi
  12. (2003). Does Foreign Aid Corrupt?” doi
  13. (1999). Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption and Economic Growth’, IMF Working Papers 99/85. doi
  14. (2008). Does Oil Corrupt? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in West Africa,” unpublished, doi
  15. (2008). Endowments, Coercion, and the Historical Containment of Education,’ unpublished,
  16. (2002). foundations of the resource curse’, doi
  17. (2001). Guia dos Royalties do Petróleo e do Gás Natural
  18. (2006). Institutions and the Resource Curse', doi
  19. (2008). Intergovernmental Transfers and Elementary Education: QuasiExperimental Evidence from Brazil,” unpublished, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. doi
  20. (2004). Kleptocracy and Divide-and-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule’, doi
  21. (2007). Leader Behaviour and the Natural Resource Curse," doi
  22. (2001). Learning by doing and the Dutch disease". doi
  23. (2004). Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda,” doi
  24. Mobarak (2007): “Decentralization and Water Pollution Spillovers: Evidence from the Re-drawing of County Boundaries in Brazil,” unpublished,
  25. (2007). Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Resource Abundance, Dependence and the Onset of Civil Wars’, Economics working paper series 08/78, CER-ETH - doi
  26. (2002). Notas sobre os Fundamentos Economicos da
  27. (2006). On the Theory of Ethnic Conflict,’ doi
  28. (2008). Produto Interno Bruto dos Municipios,” Serie Relatorios Metodologicos,
  29. (2008). Promoting Revenue Transparency, doi
  30. (2008). Renda do Petroleo no Brasil: Alguns Aspectos Fiscais e Federativos,” Revista do Bindes,
  31. (1997). resource abundance and economic growth – revised version’, Working Paper, doi
  32. Rogério, and Fernando Blanco Coso (2008): “Transfêrencias Intergovernamentais no Brasil: Diagnóstico e Proposta de Reforma,” Textos Para Discussão 40, Consultoria Legislativa do Senado Federal.
  33. Slaibe (2008): “Efeitos da distribuicao de royalties do petroleo sobre o crescimento dod Municipios
  34. (2008). Sobre Maledicoes e Bencaos: e possivel gerir recursos naturais de forma sustentavel? Uma analise sobre os royalties e as compensacoes financeiras no Brasil,” unpublished, Diretoria de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos.
  35. (1973). State and local behavior and federal grant policy. doi
  36. (2004). Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from "Missing Imports" doi
  37. (2006). Taxation with Representation: Intergovernmental Grants in A Plebiscite Democracy,” unpublished, Federal Reserve Board. doi
  38. (1994). The `Dutch Disease': A Disease After All?” doi
  39. (2008). The Long Term Consequences of Resource Based Specialization,” doi
  40. (2007). The Resource Curse: Which Institutions Matter?’ CMI Working Papers wp200x-x, CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute),
  41. (2005). The Varieties of Resource Experience: Natural Resource Export Structures and the Political Economy of Economic Growth’, World Bank Economic Review, doi
  42. (2001). Timber Booms and Institutional Breakdown in Southeast Asia, doi
  43. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and doi
  44. (2008). Windfall gains, Political Economy and Economic Development,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.