Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Decentralisation's effects on public investment: evidence and policy lessons from Bolivia and Colombia

By Jean-Paul Faguet

Abstract

This paper examines decentralisation in Bolivia and Colombia to explore its effects on the uses and spatial distribution of public investment, as well as government responsiveness to local needs. In both countries, investment shifted from infrastructure to social services and human capital formation. Resources were rebalanced in favour of poorer districts. In Bolivia, decentralisation made government more responsive by re-directing public investment to areas of greatest need. In Colombia, municipalities increased investment significantly while running costs fell. Six important lessons emerge from the comparison. For decentralisation to work well: (i) local democracy must be transparent, fair and competitive; (ii) local governments must face hard budget constraints; (iii) central government must be scaled back; (iv) significant tax-raising powers must be devolved; and (v) decentralisation is composed of distinct, separable components, the sequencing of which is important. Finally, (vi) what decentralisation achieves, and whether it is advisable, hinges on how central government behaved pre-reform

Topics: JL Political institutions (America except United States), F1201 Latin America (General), JS Local government Municipal government
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1080/00220380802242370
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:27160
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). Decentralisation and Government Provision of Public Goods: The Public Health Sector in Uganda. doi
  2. (1994). Decentralisation and its Implications for Urban Service Delivery doi
  3. (1998). Decentralisation and Rural Development: A Review of Evidence.
  4. (2003). Decentralisation and Supply Efficiency: The Case of Rural Water Supply in Central India. doi
  5. (1983). Decentralisation in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience. Staff Working Paper No.581, World Bank,
  6. (1988). Decentralisation in the Public Sector: An Empirical Study of State and Local Government, in: H.S. Rosen (ed) Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies,
  7. (1990). Decentralisation: The Politics of Interventionism. doi
  8. (1985). Decentralisation: The Territorial Dimension of the State (London: George Allen & Unwin). doi
  9. (1993). Development Program (UNDP) doi
  10. (2004). Does Decentralisation Increase Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia. doi
  11. (2000). Fiscal Decentralisation and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: A CrossCountry Analysis. doi
  12. (1998). Fiscal Decentralisation and LDC Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation. doi
  13. (2001). Fiscal Decentralisation in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Concepts and Practice. Democracy, Governance and Human Rights Programme Paper No.
  14. (1972). Fiscal Federalism doi
  15. (1995). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency
  16. (1997). Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice
  17. (2005). Grounding the State: Devolution and Development in India’s Panchayats. doi
  18. (1993). Historia de Bolivia (La Paz: Libreria-Editorial Juventud).
  19. (2005). How Should Subnational Government Borrowing Be Regulated? Some Cross-Country Empirical Evidence. doi
  20. (2002). Intergovernmental transfers and municipal finance in Colombia.”
  21. (2004). Local Government Borrowing: Risks and Rewards. A Report on Central and Eastern Europe (Budapest:
  22. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton: doi
  23. (1995). On the Dangers of Decentralisation. doi
  24. (2000). Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. doi
  25. (1984). Rebellion in the Veins: Political Struggle in Bolivia 1952-82 doi
  26. (1995). Secretaría Nacional de Participación Popular
  27. (1994). Secretaría Nacional de Participación Popular, Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio Ambiente doi
  28. (2004). Tendencias del Comportamiento Electoral y Descentralización en los Municipios de Colombia,
  29. (1990). The failure of the centralized state: Institutions and selfgovernance in Africa doi
  30. (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralisation doi
  31. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance doi
  32. (1999). To What Extent Can Decentralized Forms
  33. (2005). Toward Participatory and Transparent Governance: Report on the Sixth Global Forum on Reinventing Government. doi
  34. (1997). World Bank rural development officer. Interview,
  35. (1994). World Development Report: Infrastructure for Development (New York: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.