Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Famine mortality, rational political inactivity, and international food aid

By Thomas Plümper and Eric Neumayer

Abstract

Famine mortality is preventable by government action and yet some famines kill. Amartya Sen has famously stated that no famine with significant excess mortality has ever occurred in a democracy. Yet, critics have argued that some countries have experienced famine mortality despite democratic governance and that Sen’s hypothesis cannot account for the conditions under which even autocracies may prevent famine mortality. We develop a political theory of famine mortality, which suggests that it can be entirely politically rational for a political support maximizing government, democratic or not, to remain inactive in the face of severe famine threat. Differences in famine mortality are due to differences in the policies democracies and autocracies adopt in responding to this political trade-off. Autocracies are more likely to compensate only affected elite members by targeted transfers, leaving other affected individuals outside the elite vulnerable to the potentially mortal impact of famine. Democracies, however, need to employ policies with quasi-public good characteristics due to the larger number of affected individuals with political influence. We derive the testable hypotheses that famine mortality is possible in democracies, but likely to be lower than in autocracies. Moreover, a larger share of people being affected by famine relative to population size together with large quantities of international food aid being available will lower mortality in both regime types, but more so in democracies. Our hypotheses find empirical support in a cross-country time-series analysis of famine mortality in non-developed countries over the period 1972 to 2000

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, JC Political theory
Publisher: Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:25169
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25169... (external link)
  • http://www2.lse.ac.uk/governme... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25169... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1992). Alleviating transitory food crises in Sub-Saharan Africa: International altruism and trade. doi
    2. (2003). An Essay on the Principle of Population. doi
    3. (2002). Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. doi
    4. (1992). Bihar Famine,
    5. (1974). By Bread Alone. doi
    6. (2002). Climate data for political areas. doi
    7. (1974). Coping with Famine. doi
    8. (1999). Democracy as a Universal Value. doi
    9. (2000). Democratic Political Process and the Fight Against Famine. IDS Working Paper 107.
    10. (1989). Desertification, Refugees and Regional Conflict in West Africa. doi
    11. (2001). Development as Freedom. doi
    12. (2004). Earthtrends database.
    13. (2000). Famine in the Twentieth Century. IDS Working Paper 105.
    14. (2004). Famine Intensity and Magnitude Scales: A Proposal for an Instrumental Definition of Famine. doi
    15. (1990). Famine Prevention in India. doi
    16. (1997). Famines and Economics. doi
    17. (2004). FAOSTAT CD-Rom. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. doi
    18. (2004). Finite Sample Econometrics. doi
    19. (1992). Food as an Instrument of War in Contemporary African Famines: A Review of the Evidence. doi
    20. (2000). Food Availability, Entitlements and the Chinese Famine of 1959-61. doi
    21. (1990). Food Economics, and Entitlements In The Political Economy of Hunger Eds. Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen. doi
    22. (2006). Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil Wars. doi
    23. (1989). Hunger and Public Action. doi
    24. (2002). Mass Starvations and the Limitations of Famine Theorising. doi
    25. (2002). Political Institutions, Policy Choice and the Survival of Leaders. doi
    26. (1981). Poverty and Famines – An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. doi
    27. (2006). Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances and Democratic Systems. doi
    28. (2002). Reconsidering ‘Famine’. doi
    29. (2001). Sen’s Entitlement Approach: Critiques and Counter-Critiques. doi
    30. (1977). Starvation and Exchange Entitlements: A General Approach and its Application to the Great Bengal Famine.
    31. (1986). The Causes of Famine – A Refutation of Professor Sen’s Theory. doi
    32. (2000). The Changing Role of Food Aid and Finance for Food.
    33. (1974). The Conquest of Famine. London: Chatto
    34. (1994). The Functions of Famine in Southwestern Sudan: Implications for Relief. doi
    35. (2005). The Great Leap Forward: Anatomy of a Central Planning Disaster. doi
    36. (2001). The Great North Korean Famine. doi
    37. (1986). The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine. doi
    38. (2001). The Invisible Hand of Democracy. Political Control and the Provision of Public Services. doi
    39. (2003). The Logic of Political Survival. doi
    40. (1995). The New Thinking on Development. doi
    41. (2001). The North Korean Famine and its Demographic Impact. doi
    42. (2002). The Political Ecology of Famine: The North Korean Catastrophe and its Lessons.
    43. (1994). The Political Economy of Internal War: Asset Transfer, Complex Emergencies and International Aid.
    44. (1986). The Political Uses of Crisis: The Bihar Famine of 1966-1967. doi
    45. (1993). Theories of Famine. doi
    46. (1993). War and Famine in Africa. doi
    47. (2005). Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism. doi
    48. (2004). World Development Indicators on CD-Rom. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.