Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Monetary misconceptions

By Willem H. Buiter


The paper identifies a number of misconceptions about the monetary policy process and the monetary transmission mechanism in the UK. Among the misconceptions about the process are the alleged lack of regional and sectoral representativeness of the Monetary Policy Committee and the view that operational central bank independence means that monetary and fiscal policy are not properly coordinated. Among the transmission mechanism misconceptions, the "New Paradigm" figures prominently. Among the New Paradigm changes in the British economy that have been given prominence are the following: increasing openness; lower global inflation; lower profit margins, reflecting stronger competitive pressures; buoyant stock markets; a lower natural rate of unemployment; and a higher trend rate of growth of productivity. I argue that the New Paradigm has been over-hyped and misunderstood as regards its implications for monetary policy. Other misconceptions include the ''death of inflation'', the ''end of boom and bust'', a couple of Neanderthal Keynesian fallacies and the monetary fine tuning fallacy

Topics: HG Finance
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). Advice to the Monetary Policy Committee, Labour Economic Policy Group,
  2. (1996). Anglo German Productivity Growth since 1973",
  3. (1999). Back to the Future of Low Global Inflation”, The Maxwell Fry Global Finance Lecture,
  4. (1999). Boom or Doom? Ten questions for the Millennium”, CSFB,
  5. (1998). Driving Productivity and Growth in the UK
  6. (1999). Has the ‘New Economy’ Rendered the Productivity Slowdown Obsolete?”,
  7. (1995). Inflation Persistence”, doi
  8. (1999). Is Globalisation Today Really Different Than (Sic) Globalisation A Hundred Years Ago?”, doi
  9. (1999). Liquidity Traps: How to Avoid Them and How to Escape Them”. doi
  10. (1999). Monetary Stabilisation Policy in A Monetary Union: Some Simple Analytics”, Bank of England Working Paper no. doi
  11. (1999). New Facts in Finance”, NBER Working Paper Series No. doi
  12. (1999). On the Real Effects of Monetary Policy: a Central Banker’s View”,
  13. (1994). One Money Or Many? Analysing the Prospects for Monetary Union
  14. (1999). Review of Economic Policy doi
  15. (1981). Staggered Wage Setting with Real Wage Relativities: Variations on A Theme by Taylor”, doi
  16. (1997). The Economic Case for Monetary Union in the European Union", doi
  17. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, doi
  18. (1997). The Inflation Target Five Years On”, Lecture delivered at the London School of Economics, Wednesday 29 October. Bank of England mimeo.
  19. (1999). The Quest for Prosperity Without Inflation”, Staff Paper, Federal Board of Governors,
  20. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy”, doi
  21. (1999). The Stock Market and Capital Accumulation”, doi
  22. (1999). Theoretical Analysis Regarding a Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates”, doi
  23. (1999). Trend Growth; Prospects and Implications for Policy,
  24. (1991). Unemployment, Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, doi
  25. (1999). US Productivity Growth: Recent Trends and Future Prospects”, paper prepared for the Consultants Meeting,
  26. (1998). Was There Really An Earlier Period of International Financial Integration Comparable to Today?”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.