Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Child labor and the labor supply of other household members: evidence from 1920 America

By Marco Manacorda


This paper analyses the effect of child labor on household labor supply using 1920 US Census micro data. The aim of the analysis is to understand who in the household benefits from child labor. In order to identify a source of exogenous variation in child labor I use State-specific child labor laws. I find that a rise in the proportion of working children by household is associated with no variation in parents¿ labor supply. I also find a strong negative externality among children: as the proportion of working children by household rises, everything else equal, the probability that each child works falls while the probability that he attends school rises. This suggests that parents redistribute entirely the returns from child labor to the children in the household, consistent with a model of household labor supply with fully altruistic parents

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1981). A Treatise on the Family, doi
  2. (1998). America’s Graduation from High School: The Evolution and Spread of Secondary Schooling in the Twentieth Century’, doi
  3. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of doi
  4. (1974). Child-Labor Legislation and the Labor Force Participation of Children‘, doi
  5. (1992). Collective Labor Supply and Welfare’, doi
  6. (1996). Compulsory Schooling Legislation and School Attendance in Turn-of-the-Century America: A "Natural Experiment" doi
  7. (1972). Compulsory Schooling Legislation: An Economic Analysis of Law and doi
  8. (1970). Crusade for the children : a history of the National Child Labor Committee and child labor reform in America, Quadrangle Books, doi
  9. (2000). Does Unemployment Insurance Crowd out Spousal Labor Supply?’, doi
  10. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behavior, doi
  11. (1999). Egalitarianism and the Returns to Education during the Great Transformation of American Education’, doi
  12. (1997). Fumio Hayashi and Laurence Kotlikoff doi
  13. (2000). How Large Are Human Capital Externalities?, Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws’, doi
  14. (1990). Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach’, The Journal of Human Resources (in doi
  15. (2000). Is Child Labor Inefficient?’, doi
  16. (1996). Labor Markets in the Twentieth Century’, doi
  17. (1994). Like Father, like Son; Like Mother, like Daughter: Parental Resources and Child Height‘, doi
  18. (1989). Parental Altruism and Self-Interest: Child Labor Among late doi
  19. (1992). School Quality and Black-White Relative Earnings: A Direct Assessment‘, doi
  20. (1996). Technology, Skill, and the Wage Structure: Insights from the Past’, doi
  21. (1985). The Added Worker Effect‘, doi
  22. (2002). The Effects of Risk on Education and Child Labour’, IFS Working Paper W02/07,
  23. (1974). The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effects in a Model of Family Labor Supply‘, doi
  24. (1973). The Intrafamily Allocation of Time: doi
  25. (1980). Unemployment as Disequilibrium in a Model of Aggregate Labor Supply‘, doi
  26. (2002). Were Compulsory Attendance and Child Labor Laws Effective?: An Analysis from 1915 to 1939‘, doi
  27. (2003). Why Does Financial Development Matter? The United States from 1900 to 1940‘, NBER Working Paper No 9551, doi
  28. (1997). Why the United States Led in Education: Lessons from Secondary School Expansion, doi
  29. (1982). Women, Children, and Industrialization in the Early Republic: Evidence from the Manufacturing Censuses‘, doi
  30. (2002). Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.