Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Why do voice regimes differ?

By Paul Willman, Alex Bryson and Rafael Gomez


In this paper we seek to explain the emergence of different voice regimes, and to do so by using approaches from institutional economics. In particular we analyse the emergence of different voice regimes as a contracting problem; a ¿make¿ or ¿buy¿ decision on the part of the employer. A unique feature of the model is that the firm, having chosen its particular employee management regime, faces switching costs if it attempts to alter its original make or buy decision. A particular dimension of the employee management regime decision is the use of the union as agent or supplier of voice, or elements thereof. We argue that there are circumstances in which the employer may, on grounds of cost or risk, seek to subcontract aspects of the management of labour to a union and, further, that this (along with the presence of switching costs) helps explain the continued recognition of trade unions in many firms. In other circumstances, however, the employer may seek to construct voice mechanisms without union involvement. Workplace data from Britain are used to test these and other implications of the model

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). All Change at Work, doi
  2. (2003). Changes Over Time in Union Relative Wage Effects doi
  3. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: the Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives’, doi
  4. (2002). Comparing the Demand for Unionisation Between Youths and Adults’,
  5. (1993). Equal Opportunity Law and the doi
  6. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty, doi
  7. (2001). Foreign Ownership, Microelectronic Technology and Skills: Evidence for British Establishments’, presented at the 2nd WERS User Group, doi
  8. (2000). Have British Workers Lost their Voice, or Have they Gained a New One?’,
  9. (1996). Integrating Variable Risk Preferences, doi
  10. (2002). Marching On Together? Reasons for the Recent Decline in Union Membership’, doi
  11. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies, doi
  12. (1982). Opportunism and Labour Contracting: An Application of the Organisational Failures Framework’,
  13. (1998). Restructuring the Employment Relationship, doi
  14. (1995). Risk, doi
  15. (2002). Ronald Reagan and the Politics of Declining Union Organization’, doi
  16. (1997). Strategic Marketing Management, doi
  17. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism; Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, Free Press: doi
  18. (2002). The Experience Good Model of Union Membership’.
  19. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited; Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organisational Fields’, doi
  20. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, doi
  21. (1997). The Representation Gap, doi
  22. (2001). The Viability of Trade Union Organisation: A Bargaining Unit Analysis’, doi
  23. (1993). Union Business; Trade Union Organisation and Financial Reform in the Thatcher Years, doi
  24. (2000). Union Decline in Britain’, doi
  25. (2003). Union Effects on Workplace Closure,
  26. (1984). What Do Unions Do? Basic Books: doi
  27. (1999). What Has Happened to the Union Wage Differential doi
  28. (2001). What Workers Want from Workplace Organizations: A Report to the TUC’s Promoting Trade Unionism Task Group,
  29. (1999). What Workers Want, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.