Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Chain indices of the cost of living and the path-dependence problem: an empirical solution

By Nicholas Oulton


This paper proposes an empirically feasible method for correcting the path-dependence bias of chain indices of the cost of living. Chain indices are discrete approximations to Divisia indices and it is well known that the latter are path-dependent: the level of a Divisia index is affected not just by the level of prices at the two endpoints but also by the path between the endpoints. It is also well-known that a Divisia index of the cost of living is path-independent if and only if all income elasticities are equal to one, a restriction that is decisively rejected by studies of consumer demand. In theory, the true cost of living index (or Konüs price index) could be derived by estimating the expenditure function. But this seems impractical due to data limitations: the number of independent parameters rises roughly in proportion to the square of the number of commodities and consumer price indices contain hundreds of items. This paper shows how this problem can in fact be overcome empirically using a flexible model of demand like the “Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System”. The proposed method requires data only on prices, aggregate budget shares and aggregate expenditure. The method is applied to estimate Konüs price indices for 70 products covering nearly all the UK’s Retail Prices Index over 1974-2004, with each year in turn as the base. The choice of base year for utility is found to have a significant effect on the index, even in the low inflation period since 1990

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1980). An almost ideal demand system”. doi
  2. (2000). An exact price index for the almost ideal demand system”. doi
  3. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  4. (1997). BEA’s chain indexes, time series, and measures of long-term economic growth”. Survey of Current Business,
  5. (1996). Boskin Commission [Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index]
  6. (1999). Comparing price levels across countries using minimum-spinning trees”. doi
  7. (2004). Constructing price indexes across space and time: the case of the European Union”. doi
  8. (2006). Consumer Price Indices: Technical Manual doi
  9. (2004). Direct and chained indices: a review of two paradigms”.
  10. (1973). Divisia index numbers”. doi
  11. (2005). Divisia price and quantity indices: 80 years after”. doi
  12. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge: doi
  13. (1987). Index numbers”. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, edited by doi
  14. (1997). Instrument relevance in multivariate linear models: a simple measure”. doi
  15. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing”.
  16. (1974). Invariant economic index numbers and canonical duality: survey and synthesis”.
  17. (1957). Mathematical Analysis. doi
  18. (1982). Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers”. doi
  19. (1995). Problems with instrumental variable estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variables is weak”. doi
  20. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand”. doi
  21. (2004). Rationalizing the Penn World Table: true multilateral indices for international comparisons of real income”. doi
  22. (1981). The economic theory of index numbers: a survey”. doi
  23. (1927). The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of Their Varieties, Tests, and Reliability (3 rd edition). doi
  24. (1939). The problem of the true index of the cost-of-living”. doi
  25. (1998). The Retail Prices Index: Technical Manual :

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.