Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Productivity dispersion, competition and productivity measurement

By Ralf Martin


A startling fact of firm level productivity analysis is the large and persistent differences in both labour productivity and total factor productivity (TFP) between firms in narrowly defined sectoral classes. The competitiveness of an industry is potentially an important factor explaining this productivity dispersion. The degree of competition has also implications for the measurement of TFP at the firm level. This paper firstly develops a novel control function approach to production function and TFP estimation explicitly taking imperfect competition into account. This addresses a number of issues with the control function approach to productivity estimation. Secondly, applying this new approach to UK data it shows that productivity dispersion on average is about 50 percent higher than with standard TFP measures. It also shows that accounting for imperfect competition matters for estimates of the persistence of TFP. Thirdly, the paper finds a negative relationship between competition and productivity dispersion

Topics: HF Commerce, HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). Adjustment costs and the identi¯cation of cobb douglas production functions. IFS Working Papers W05/04.
  2. (2002). Building the capital stock.
  3. (2003). Building the evidence base for productivity policy using business data linking. Economic Trends,
  4. (2002). Business data linking: An Introduction. Economic Trends,
  5. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. doi
  6. (1994). Estimating discrete-choice models of product di®erentiation.
  7. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. doi
  8. (1999). Market power, scale economies and productivity: estimates from a panel of establishment data. doi
  9. (1995). Markov perfect industry dynamics - a framework for empirical work. Review of Economic Studies, doi
  10. (2005). Plant survival, market fundamentals and trade liberalization. mimeo IMF. doi
  11. (1995). Production functions: The search for identi¯cation. doi
  12. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, doi
  13. (1998). Productivity dynamics: U.S. manufacturing plants 1972-1986. doi
  14. (1997). Returns to scale in u.s. production: Estimates and implications. doi
  15. (2007). Structural identi¯cation of production functions.
  16. (1991). Sunk costs and market structure : price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration. doi
  17. (1997). The ABI Respondents Database: A new resource for industrial economics research. Economic Trends,
  18. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecomunications equipment industry. doi
  19. (1996). The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobserved and endogenous. doi
  20. (2000). Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. doi
  21. (1983). Using sample weights in multiple regression analysis of strati¯ed samples. doi
  22. (1999). Using the ARD establishment level data to look at foreign ownership and productivity in the UK. doi
  23. (2000). What raises productivity? the microeconomics of UK productivity growth.
  24. (2003). Why plant-level productivity studies are often misleading, and an alternative approach to interference. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.