Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A case study of and African American charter school\u27s satisfactory performance based on the perception of stakehoders of parents, teachers, students, and the community members.

By Maury Lynn Wills

Abstract

If success is judged by parents and students voting with their feet, charter schools are in demand as these people are practically running to guarantee their children\u27s admission into charter schools across the nation. Although it is premature to rest on this slim evidence without other indicators of success such as student performance; parents and students are choosing charter schools for a variety of personal and situational reasons that ale highlighted in this case study. The charter school in this case study is located in a southern metropolitan area. The charter school demographics consist of mainly middle class African American families who have decided to select the charter school as their child\u27s primary education agency. This year long case study reflects the perceptions of parents. students, teachers. and community members with respect to hen satisfied they are ninth the charter school. The case study sought out to examine this level of satisfaction based on the schools goals. The research question that guided the study was: Do charter school goals provide a framework to identify and measure stakeholder satisfaction? Four specific research questions were used to develop the response to this guided research question. as well as a theme as a result of participants\u27 responses. The case study design relied on three research strategies to determine conclusions and findings. These three strategies included interviews. observations and analyzing documents A qualitative design was used to describe the voices, perceptions, and experiences of the participants The recurring themes that were found in this study included student-teacher engagement, teacher creativity development. participation of civic and values, teaching awareness of recycling, conservation, and protection of environment; and the development of local political decision making. The conclusions. findings, and implications derived from an analysis of the data, which strongly relied on themes found

Topics: School\u27s satisactory performances, Education
Publisher: DigitalCommons@Robert W. Woodruff Library, Atlanta University Center
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:digitalcommons.auctr.edu:dissertations-1550

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). Are charter school parents more satisfied with schools? Evidence form Washington, doi
  2. (1991). Chalactel istics of effectix e schools
  3. (2007). Chalter school statues and special education: Policy answers or policy ambiguity The .Jozirn~rl qf Speci~11 Edztccttion.
  4. (1998). Charter conundrum.
  5. (2000). Churters, votlchers earning mzxed reports.
  6. (1988). Convention plots nem course A charterfor Change, iVew1 York Tzmes, section 4,
  7. (1991). Correlates of charter school effectibeness. Okemos. I Effective Schools Ptlblicntzons
  8. (1988). Education by charter* Rest~ucturing school districts Andover. MA: Regioncrl Laborntor-J! fbu. Edziccrrional !r7pr.overnent ofthe Xorthenst & Is1nnd.y Budde,
  9. (2006). Evaluation 6i kducation Polic
  10. (2006). Georgicr 's churter schools continue to lend the ~vcly in nchietling adeyztcrte yearly progress
  11. (1989). Parent choice works fol us Lo\~eless, T.
  12. (2007). Refo~m Chaltel law scorecard ranks states. 5'" ,4nnzl~ll Analysis Charter School Research
  13. (2007). Retrieved on August 7,2007 at wc\;w.uscharterschools.org
  14. (2005). Revzevt. comrnlttee on ot~tcon?es: Survey results.
  15. (1994). School Choice: The Struggle for the Soul of American Education, doi
  16. (2004). State Cutting AlcJ to Charter School.
  17. (2002). Student satisfaction. Austin, TX: Teua~ Center.fi)r Ed~lccrtional Re5 ear .ch Bogdan.
  18. (2004). The charter school movement Encouraging results and a disappointing article doi
  19. (2000). The Effect of School Choice: An Evaluation of the Charlotte C'hildren'r Scholarship FLIMUI,'-
  20. (2002). The first charter School. .C.lotes~or-i L i f i ,
  21. (2005). The po\\er of ideas.
  22. (2000). The pouer to choose. Horizon scholarship program second annual report.
  23. (2000). The stclte ofchctrter. schools. Fourth Year Repolt (Publication No ISBN 0-16-050267-5).
  24. (2005). Transforming urban school through investments in the social capital of parents.
  25. What kind of decisions do you help to make in your school?
  26. (2000). Why are parents of children with disabilities choosing chartel schools? Unpublished doctoral dissertation,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.