Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The debate on warlordism: the importance of military legitimacy

By Antonio Giustozzi

Abstract

Despite the careless use of the terms ' warlord' and ' warlordism' by the media, both have become increasingly popular among academics, even if some scholars object to their use. This paper draws on direct field experience as well as the ongoing debate. It aims, on the one hand, to reconcile the different perspectives - which are often not necessarily at odds with each other - and on the other hand, to propose a definition of 'warlordism' for the social sciences that is both closer to that used so far by historians and at the same time consistent with emerging evidence from the field

Topics: JC Political theory
Publisher: Crisis States Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:13316
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). Shadow Globalization, Ethnic Conflicts and New Wars: A Political Economy of Intra-State War, doi
  2. (1998). The Revolutionary United Front of Sierra Leone’, doi
  3. (1994). UNITA’s diamond mining and exporting capacity’, in Jakkie Cilliers and Christian Dietrich (eds), Angola's War Economy, Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.