Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Fathers under fire: the revolution in child support enforcement in the USA

By Irwin Garfinkel, Sara McLanahan, Daniel Meyer and Judith Seltzer

Abstract

In the shadow of rising divorce and non-marital birth rates, nearly two-thirds of all American children today will live apart from at least one of their parents, usually the father. Clearly this astonishing proportion of non-resident fathers has serious implications for the economic, employment, and educational status of mothers and the development and wellbeing of children. But according to the authors of Fathers Under Fire, a more comprehensive perspective on non-resident fathers - understanding their capacities and circumstances, acknowledging their responses to policy changes, and recognising their needs -- is essential in order to derive value from the past twenty years of policy change, and to design more effective policies for the future. Fathers Under Fire is intended as a first step toward public policy that reflects the interests of children, families, and society as a whole - by including the diverse perspectives and potential of non-resident fathers. The book traces the recent evolution of child support policy which is shifting the burden of supporting children in single parent families from the public and mothers to non-resident fathers. Fathers Under Fire argues that, as yet, the shift has neither improved the standard of living for mothers and children, nor helped the fathers to be able to meet their obligations. The authors explore the various 'side effects' of rigorous enforcement, especially for low-income fathers, finding that 1) a 'proportional standard' of support determination would improve compliance without economically crippling those fathers who are already hovering in or near poverty; 2) child support enforcement does seem to reduce the likelihood of both remarriage and subsequent out-of-wedlock births for low-income non-resident fathers; 3) payment of support does tend to coincide (for better and worse) with seeing the children more often, and having more influence in child-rearing decisions

Topics: HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 1998
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:6513
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). A National Profile of Non-resident Fathers and Their Ability to Pay Child Support,” doi
  2. (1998). Can Child Support Enforcment Reduce Teenage Premarital Childbearing? Paper presented at the Population Association Meetings,
  3. (1994). Child Support Awards and the doi
  4. (1988). Child Support: A Father’s View,” in Child Support: From Debt Collection to Social Policy,
  5. (1988). Child Support: From Debt Collection to Social Policy. Newbury Park: doi
  6. (1994). Contact with non-resident parents, interparental conflict, and children’s behaviour,” doi
  7. (1993). Current research and controversies on stepfamilies in the United States”. Paper presented at the International Meeting, Les Recompositions Familiales Aujord’hui,
  8. (1998). Deadbeats and turnips in child support doi
  9. (1980). Death and the family,” doi
  10. (1996). Double Jeopardy: Parental Conflict and Stepfamily Outcomes for Children.” doi
  11. (1982). Effects of divorce on parents and children,” doi
  12. (1998). Father by Law: doi
  13. (1997). Fathers and Fatherhood doi
  14. (1994). Growing Up With a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. doi
  15. (1993). Income Growth Among Nonresident Fathers: Evidence From Wisconsin” Demography, doi
  16. (1979). Making Fathers Pay: The Enforcement of Child Support. doi
  17. (1978). Making Visitation Work: Dual Parenting Orders.”
  18. (1996). of the Census, doi
  19. (1991). Relationships between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart: The Father’s Role After Separation.” doi
  20. (1994). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody and mediation, doi
  21. (1986). Single Mothers and Their Children: A New American Dilemma.
  22. (1900). Single Parenthood in
  23. (1995). The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Wellbeing of Children and Families. doi
  24. (1986). The Economic Impact of Child Support Refrom on the Poverty Status of doi
  25. (1997). The effect of child support enforcement on marital dissolution.” doi
  26. (1996). The Impact of Percentage-Expressed Child Support Orders on Payments Over Time,” doi
  27. (1965). The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. Washington D.C.: Office of Planning and Research,
  28. (1975). Time of transition: The growth of families headed by women. doi
  29. (1997). Trapped by poverty and trapped by abuse: new evidence documenting the relationship between domestic violence and welfare”: Executive summary.
  30. (1993). When and Why Fathers Matter: Impacts of Father Involvement on the Children of Adolescent Mothers.” In Young Unwed Fathers: Changing Roles and Emerging Policies,
  31. (1998). Will Child Support Enforcement Reduce Non-marital Childbearing? Originally presented at doi
  32. (1993). Young Fathers and Parenting in Two Inner-City Neighborhoods,” in Young Unwed Fathers: Changing Roles and Emerging Policies, doi
  33. (1993). Young Unwed Fathers: Changing Roles and Emerging Policies. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.