Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comparing incomes when needs differ: equivalisation for the extra costs of disability in the UK

By Asghar Zaidi and Tania Burchardt

Abstract

Equivalisation of incomes for household size and composition is accepted practice when measuring poverty and inequality; adjustments to take account of other variations in needs are rarely made. This paper explores the financial implications of one possible source of additional needs: disability. Using two UK household surveys, we seek to establish whether there are extra costs of living associated with disability, and to quantify them using the ¿standard of living¿ approach. The underlying theory is that a household¿s standard of living is a function of income and needs. The extra costs of disability can be derived by comparing the standard of living of households with and without disabled members at a given income, having controlled for other sources of variation. Results show that the extra costs of disability are substantial, especially for disabled people living alone, and that these costs rise with severity of disability. To bring out the policy implications of these results, we compare and contrast three different income distributions which differ in their adjustment for the extra costs of disability, for the population as a whole and for various subgroups. We find that unadjusted incomes significantly understate the problem of low income amongst disabled people, and thereby in the population as a whole

Topics: HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:6373
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1895), “Die Lebenskosten Belgischer Arbeiter-Familien Fruher und
  2. (1976). A new approach to the construction of family equivalence scales”, doi
  3. (2000). Charging with Care: How councils charge for home care. Abingdon: Audit Commission.
  4. (1999). Development as Freedom. doi
  5. (1992). Differences in needs and assessment of income distributions”, doi
  6. (1988). Disability, Household Income and Expenditure: A follow-up survey of disabled adults
  7. (1995). Equivalence scales and the costs of disability”, doi
  8. (1997). Estimating Relative Needs Through a Comparison of Living Standards. London: Policy Studies Institute.
  9. (1987). Evaluating adequacy: The potential of budget standards”, doi
  10. (2002). Households Below Average Income 1994/95-2000/01. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
  11. (1996). Households, goods and well-being”, doi
  12. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. doi
  13. (1988). Not the OPCS survey: Being disabled costs more than they said.
  14. (1943). Note on a method of determining equivalent income for families of different composition,”
  15. (1997). On Economic Inequality. Expanded edition with a substantial annexe by
  16. (1986). On measuring child costs: With applications to poor countries”, doi
  17. (1988). Smeeding doi
  18. (1993). The Economic Problems of Disabled People. London: Policy Studies Institute.
  19. (1988). The Financial Circumstances of Disabled Adults Living in Private Households.
  20. (1988). The Prevalence of Disability among Adults.
  21. (1979). Welfare comparisons and equivalence scales”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.