Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Foundations for measuring equality: a discussion paper for the equalities review

By Tania Burchardt

Abstract

The Equalities Review is an independent panel set up by the UK government in 2005 to investigate the persistence of social inequalities and to make recommendations for the development of a unified Commission for Equality and Human Rights. This paper was originally written for the Review. It canvasses possible responses to the questions, ‘equality between whom?’ and ‘equality of what?’. It argues that equality of outcome is intuitively appealing but risks ignoring variations in need, differences in values and preferences, and the importance of individual agency. A broad interpretation of equality of opportunity, such as is provided by the capability approach, can address these limitations, by focusing on the substantive freedom enjoyed by individuals. Substantive freedom may be limited by a lack of personal resources, or by the economic, social, political, cultural, and environmental conditions context in which the individual is operating. The paper concludes by identifying, and indicating solutions to, a number of measurement issues that arise in operationalising the capability approach

Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:6236
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. doi
  2. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. doi
  3. (1999). Development as Freedom. doi
  4. (2000). Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
  5. (2002). Egalitarianism”, in E. Zalta (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall
  6. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. doi
  7. (2003). http://www.dwp.gov.uk/consultations/consult/2003/childpov/final.pdf (Accessed 9/1/2006) European Commission
  8. (1998). Mortality as an indicator of economic success or failure”, doi
  9. (2004). On the arbitrariness and robustness of multidimensional poverty rankings”, doi
  10. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities”, doi
  11. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: the theory and practice of equality. doi
  12. (2005). The contributions of Professor Amartya Sen in the field of human rights, CASEpaper 91. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/CASEpaper91.pdf (Accessed 9/1/2006) Wolff,
  13. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.