Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Property right or development strategy?: protection of foreign copyright in 19th Century America and contemporary China

By Bingchun Meng


This paper offers a critical view of the current international copyright regime through a comparative analysis of the protection of foreign copyrights in the 19th century United States and that in contemporary China. The first part of this paper is a retrospective analysis of how the early US copyright statute dealt with the copyright of foreign works and what the rationales were behind the discrimination against foreign authors’ rights. The treatment of foreign works in Chinese copyright law is then discussed, demonstrating that such treatment was strongly influenced by the hegemonic power that the US and other developed countries had established in the arena of international copyright. In the conclusion the two historical accounts are drawn together to highlight the impracticability and injustice of the current trend toward the harmonisation of international copyright law

Topics: K Law (General), PN1990 Broadcasting
Publisher: Media@LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1979). Agreement on Trade Relations Between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China. doi
  2. (1989). An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, doi
  3. (1967). An Unhurried view of Copyright. doi
  4. (1996). Can the Intellectual Property Rights System Serve the Interests of Indigenous Knowledge?,
  5. (1992). Charles Dickens, International Copyright, and the Discretionary Silence of
  6. (1998). Considering Multiple and Overlapping Sovereignties: Liberalism, libertarianism, national sovereignty, 'global' intellectual property, and the Internet,
  7. (2002). Constructing Copyright's Mythology, doi
  8. (1997). Convergence of National Intellectual Property Norms in International Trading Agreements,
  9. (1906). Copyright Enactments of the United States 1783-1906. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
  10. (1968). Copyright in Historical Perspective. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. EWP-11 - 22
  11. (2001). Copyrights and Copywrongs: The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. doi
  12. (1962). DC: Government Printing Office. doi
  13. (2000). From Pirates to Partners: Protecting intellectual property in China in the twenty-first century, doi
  14. (1994). Global Information Policymaking and Domestic Law,
  15. (1993). Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method, doi
  16. (2003). Harmony or Discord? The pressure toward conformity in international copyright, IDEA:
  17. (2003). Intellectual Property in China. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia.
  18. (1994). Intellectual Property in East Asia: How theory does--and does not--matter.
  19. (2004). Intellectual Property Rights and Global Capitalism: The Political doi
  20. (1986). Intellectual Property Rights in an Age of Electronics and Information OTA-CIT-302. Washington DC: Government Printing Office. doi
  21. (2000). Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: The TRIPs agreement and policy options. London & doi
  22. (2001). International Copyright: Principles, law, and the practice.
  23. (1997). Introduction to Intellectual Property: Theory and practice. doi
  24. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. doi
  25. (1998). Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington DC:
  26. (1991). Office of the United States Trade Representative doi
  27. (1998). Piracy of Intellectual Property in China and the Former Soviet Union and its Effects upon International Trade: A comparison,
  28. (1997). Poets, Pirates, and the Creation of American Literature,
  29. (1995). Production v. doi
  30. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. doi
  31. (1996). Shamans, Software & Spleens: Law, and the construction of information society. doi
  32. (1999). Software Protection in China: A complete Guide. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia.
  33. (1986). The Berne Convention and the Universal Copyright Convention: The American experience, doi
  34. (2003). The Copyright Divide, Cardozo Law Review,
  35. (1999). The Evolution of Chinese Attitudes Toward Property Rights in Invention and Discovery, doi
  36. (1993). The GATT Uruguay Round: A negotiating history (1986-1992):
  37. (2000). The Gramsci Reader: Selected writings 1916-1935,
  38. (1960). The Movement for International Copyright in Nineteenth Century America. Washington DC: The Catholic doi
  39. (2002). The Paradox of Intellectual Property Lawmaking in the New Millennium: Universal templates as terms of surrender for non-industrial nations. doi
  40. (2004). The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Law. Washington DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. doi
  41. (1996). The TRIPS Agreement: Imperialistic, outdated, and overprotective,
  42. (1997). The United States-China Copyright Dispute: A Two Level Games Analysis, doi
  43. (1995). To Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual property law in Chinese civilization. Stanford: doi
  44. (1999). Understanding Copyright Law (3rd ed.).

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.