Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Introductory article: on the discourse of terrorism, security and development

By Jo Beall, Thomas Goodfellow and James Putzel

Abstract

This paper introduces the policy arena by examining the increasing interlinking of international development policy with security concerns, particularly at a discursive level in the global North and especially since the declaration of the United States led ‘War on Terror’. The authors propose that it is not only the US that has altered its approach to development in light of the new security agenda, but so too have some multilateral development organisations, along with bilateral donors that in the past have been associated with a less politically-determined programme of development cooperation. The incorporation of security concerns in development thinking is not new and dates back at least to the Cold War era. Although the security-development nexus can be construed positively, the linkage has taken on new forms and dynamics in the contemporary context. Increasingly, development is viewed by some actors as a means of addressing ‘looming threats’ emanating from the global South towards the North. The authors suggest that if security for the North becomes a central guiding principle for development in the South, this will be damaging for both the project of global poverty reduction and global security

Topics: JZ International relations, U Military Science (General), JF Political institutions (General)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1002/jid.1262
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:2901
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2901/... (external link)
  • http://www.interscience.wiley.... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2901/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2004). A Breeding Ground for Terrorists? Africa and Britain’s ‘War on Terrorism’. doi
    2. (2003). A CICC Commentary on A Development Co-operation Lens on Terrorism Prevention: Key Entry Points for Action. Canadian Council for International Co-operation. http://www.ccic.ca/e/home/index.shtml US.
    3. (1974). A Skeptical Look at the Concept of Terrorism. doi
    4. (2004). Aid and Conflict: the policy coherence challenge. doi
    5. (2004). Aid and Terrorism – What About the Poor? Available at: http://www.realityofaid.org/rchecknews.php?table=rc_oct04&id=1 Rehman J.
    6. (2005). Armaments, Disarmament and International Security,
    7. (1982). Development Debacle: The World Bank in the Philippines. Institute for Food and Development Policy:
    8. (2004). Good Muslim, doi
    9. (2003). Humanitarian Action and the 'Global War on Terror': A review of Trends and Issues. Human Policy Group Report No.
    10. (2006). Official Development Assistance increases further - but
    11. (2004). Terror in the Sahara: the Implications of US Imperialism for North and West Africa. Review of African Political Economy 101: 475-596 doi
    12. (2003). The No-Nonsense Guide to Terrorism. doi
    13. (2004). The Politics of Poverty: Aid in the New Cold War. Available at http://www.christianaid.org.uk/indepth/404caweek/ CIDA.
    14. (2003). The Revision of the ‘ODA Charter’ and Japan’s New Approach. Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2003/part1_2_1_3.html MOFA.
    15. (1996). The Story of Official Development Assistance: A History of the Development Assistance Committee and the Development Co-operation Directorate in Dates, Names and Figures.
    16. (2004). Three Issues doi
    17. (2002). US Hegemony and the World Bank: The Fight over People and Ideas. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.