Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

'Direct and Indirect Shadow Price Estimates of Nitrate Pollution Treated as an Undesirable Output and Input', Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Vol. 27, No. 2 (December 2002) pp: 420-432.

By Saleem Shaik, Glenn A Helmers and Michael Langemeier

Abstract

The implication of treating environmental pollution as an undesirable output (weak disposability) as well as a normal input (strong disposability) on the direct and indirect shadow price and cost estimates of nitrogen pollution abatement is analyzed using Nebraska agriculture sector data. The shadow price of nitrogen pollution abatement treated as an undesirable output represents the reduced revenue from reducing nitrogen pollution. In contrast, the shadow price of nitrogen pollution abatement treated as an input reflects the increased cost of reducing nitrogen pollution. For the 1936-97 period, the estimated shadow price and cost of nitrogen pollution abatement for Nebraska ranges from $0.91 to $2.21 per pound and from $300 to $729 million, respectively.Direct and indirect approaches, disposability, nitrogen pollution, nonparametric programming, shadow price

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). Accounting for the Environment in Agriculture."
  2. Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function Approach." Rev. Econ. and Statis.
  3. (1997). Econometric Measurement of Technical and Environmental Efficiency of Dutch Diary Farms." Work. pap., Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI-DLO), The Netherlands,
  4. Environmental Costing for Agriculture: Will It Be Standard Fare in the Farm Bill of 2000?"Amer.
  5. (1994). Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Agriculture." Paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium,
  6. Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-Fueled Electric Power Generations."
  7. Environmental Regulations and U.S. Economic Growth."
  8. (1998). Environmentally Adjusted Productivity [EAP] Measures for Nebraska Agriculture Sector." Unpub.
  9. From Total Factor to Total Resource Productivity: An Application to Agriculture."
  10. Issues in Pollution Control: Interplant Cost Differences and Economies of Scale." Land Econ.
  11. Measuring Productivity of Environmentally Interactive Technologies: The Case of Agriculture and the Environment."
  12. (1995). Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications.
  13. Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs Are Undesirable: ANonparametricApproach."Rev.
  14. (1995). Nutrients in Ground Water and Surface Water of the United States: An Analysis of Data through 1992." U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations (WRI)
  15. (1990). Occurrence of Pesticides and Nitrate in Nebraska's Ground Water."
  16. (1981). Pollution Controls and Productivity Growth in Basic Industries."
  17. (1999). Shadow Price of Environmental Bads: Weak vs. Strong Disposability." Paper presented at annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association,
  18. Shadow Pricing of Good and Bad Commodities."
  19. Should Pollution Reductions Count as Productivity Gains for Agriculture?"Amer.
  20. (1993). Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. Washington DC:
  21. The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry." Rev. Econ. and Statis.
  22. (1996). The Environmental Implications of Agriculture."
  23. The Impact of Pollution Abatement
  24. The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2 Allowances."
  25. (1999). The Role of Nonparametric Analysis in Adjusting Agricultural Productivity Measurement for Environmental Impacts." Paper presented at annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association,
  26. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production. Princeton NJ:
  27. (1998). Water Science Laboratory, Institute ofAgriculture and Natural Resources, The University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Personal Communication: Unpublished data from Central Platte Natural Resource District on corn production and nitrate contamination in wells,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.