Location of Repository

Federal Policies for Renewable Electricity: Impacts and Interactions

By Karen Palmer, Anthony Paul and Matt Woerman

Abstract

Three types of policies that are prominent in the federal debate over addressing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States are a cap-and-trade program (CTP) on emissions, a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) for electricity production, and tax credits for renewable electricity producers. Each of these policies would have different consequences, and combinations of these policies could induce interactions yielding a whole that is not the sum of its parts. This paper utilizes the Haiku electricity market model to evaluate the economic and technology outcomes, climate benefits, and cost-effectiveness of three such policies and all possible combinations of the policies. A central finding is that the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reductions from CTP can be significantly greater than those from the other policies, even for similar levels of renewable electricity production, since of the three policies, CTP is the only one that distinguishes electricity generated by coal and natural gas. It follows that CTP is the most cost-effective among these approaches at reducing CO2 emissions. An alternative compliance payment mechanism in an RPS program could substantially affect renewables penetration, and the electricity price effects of the policies hinge partly on the regulatory structure of electricity markets, which varies across the country.renewable portfolio standard, renewable energy credits, cap-and-trade, climate policy

OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2008). 20% Wind Energy by 2030—Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply.
  2. 2003/2004 Winter Assessment: Reliability of the Bulk Electricity Supply in
  3. (2009). An Examination of the Regional Supply and Demand Balance for Renewable Electricity in the United States through 2015. NREL
  4. (2010). Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook
  5. (2007). Can Deployment of Renewable Energy Put Downward Pressure on Natural Gas Prices? Energy Policy 35(1): 295-306.Resources for the Future Palmer, Paul, and Woerman
  6. (2010). Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of the Parts?
  7. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Three Proposed Federal Renewable Electricity Standards.
  8. (2003). Electric Reliability Council (NERC).
  9. (2005). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  10. (2010). Evaluating Renewable Portfolio Standards and Carbon Cap Scenarios in the U.S. Electric Sector.
  11. (2009). Feed-in Tariff Policy: Design, Implementation, and RPS Policy Interactions.
  12. (2009). Green Power Marketing in the United States: A Status Report
  13. (2009). Haiku Documentation: RFF’s Electricity Market Model version 2.0. Report. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  14. (2007). Integrative Environmental Research (CIER).
  15. (2010). Modeling Policies to Promote Renewables and Low Carbon Sources of Electricity.
  16. (2009). PTC, ITC, or Cash Grant? An Analysis of the Choice Facing Renewable Power Projects in the United States.
  17. (2009). Renewable Energy: A Cautionary Tale about Feed-In Tariffs. Greenwire,
  18. (2010). Renewable Portfolio Standards: When Do They Lower Energy Prices?
  19. (2008). The Development, Deployment and Policy Context of Renewable Electricity: A Focus on Wind. Presentation at the Fourth Meeting of the Panel on Electricity from Renewables,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.