Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An empirical test of a Neo-Malthusian theory of fertility change

By Eric Neumayer


Some neo-Malthusians regard fertility as being kept in check by scarcities and constraints and, conversely, as being raised by economic prosperity. Since out-migration to developed countries and the receipt of food aid from developed countries relax the constraints imposed by a country’s carrying capacity, both will have a positive effect on fertility rates in developing countries. Moreover, better economic prospects will also raise fertility, all other things equal. This article provides an empirical test of these hypotheses derived from a neo-Malthusian theory of fertility change. The results fail to confirm the theory and often contradict it

Topics: GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s11111-006-0024-3
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). A Darwinian account of the fertility opportunity hypothesis. doi
  2. An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: doi
  3. (1991). Chronic famine and the immorality of food aid: a bow to Garrett Hardin. doi
  4. (2001). Development as freedom. doi
  5. (2006). Eric Neumayer and Inge Røpke. doi
  6. (2002). Famine demography: perspectives from the past and present. doi
  7. (2002). Fertility decline in former “Asian tigers”.
  8. (2000). Fertility decline in the modern world and in the original demographic transition: testing three theories with cross-national data. doi
  9. (1994). Impact of migration on fertility in SubSaharan Africa. doi
  10. (1988). Lifeboat U.S.A. (Part 1).
  11. (1989). Lifeboat U.S.A. (Part 2).
  12. (2004). Live and let die: the tragedy of Hardin’s social Darwinism. doi
  13. (1974). Living on a Lifeboat. doi
  14. (2005). Migration and fertility: competing hypotheses re-examined. doi
  15. (2002). On the relationship between fertility and geographic latitude: a cross-national study. doi
  16. (1997). Population and third world assistance – a comment on Hardin’s lifeboat ethics. doi
  17. (2002). Population Dynamics: Poverty, Inequality, and Self-Regulating Fertility Rates.
  18. (2004). Population, Migration and Globalization. doi
  19. (1993). Practical ethics. Second, revised edition. Cambridge:
  20. (2006). Skilled Migration: the Perspective of Developing Countries. doi
  21. (2004). Sustainability ethics: zero net immigration. The Social Contract XV(1):
  22. (1993). The Demographic Transition Revisited: Lessons for Foreign Aid and U.S. Immigration Policy. doi
  23. (2003). The demographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change. doi
  24. (1995). The Immigration Dilemma – Avoiding the Tragedy of the Commons. Washington, DC: Federation for American Immigration Reform.
  25. (1989). The impact of international migration on fertility: an econometric population model.
  26. (2002). Tracing the income-fertility nexus: nonparametric estimates for a panel of countries.
  27. (2002). What fundamentals drive world migration? Working Paper 9159. doi
  28. (2002). Where do U.S. immigrants come from, and why? Working Paper 8998. doi
  29. (2004). Why does migration decrease fertility? Evidence from the Philippines. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.