Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The impossibility of a Paretian republican? Some comments on Pettit and Sen

By Christian List


Philip Pettit (2001) has suggested that there are parallels between his republican account of freedom and Amartya Sen’s (1970) account of freedom as decisive preference. In this paper, I discuss these parallels from a social-choice-theoretic perspective. I sketch a formalization of republican freedom, and argue that republican freedom is formally very similar to freedom as defined in Sen’s “minimal liberalism” condition. In consequence, the republican account of freedom is vulnerable to a version of Sen's liberal paradox, an inconsistency between universal domain, freedom, and the weak Pareto principle. I argue that some standard escape-routes from the liberal paradox – those via domain restriction – are not easily available to the republican. I suggest that republicans need to take seriously the challenge of the impossibility of a Paretian republican

Topics: JA Political science (General)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0266267104001245
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1983). Alternative Libertarian Claims and Sen’s Paradox. Theory and Decision doi
    2. (2001). An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. doi
    3. (2001). Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen. doi
    4. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. doi
    5. (1982). Liberalism and Individual Preferences. doi
    6. (1982). Liberalism, independent rights and the Pareto principle. doi
    7. (1983). Liberty and social choice. doi
    8. (1976). Liberty, unanimity and rights. doi
    9. (1988). On the Consistency of Libertarian Values. doi
    10. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. doi
    11. (1981). Self-Supporting Preferences and Individual Rights: The Possibility of Paretian Libertarianism. doi
    12. (2003). The Construction of Rights. doi
    13. (1970). The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.