The persisting problem of poverty in the global south, since the 1990s, has
been increasingly analysed and tackled from the perspective of the poor
themselves. The shift of view point from a structurally oriented perspective
to a more actor-oriented view was closely related to the concept of
livelihoods, which put strong emphasis on people-centredness, and examined
the coping and survival strategies of people at risk. Livelihoods analysis
has been widely applied by research scholars as well as development
practitioners since the 1990s, but the drawbacks and pitfalls of the approach
have become more and more obvious with its continued application. The
approach has been criticised for its imbalanced consideration of the
structure–agency relation, narrow focus on the household as a unit of
analysis, narrow and non-embedded understanding of assets, and negligence of
spatial and temporal dynamics. The livelihoods perspective is at a
crossroads. Several scholars have drawn on Bourdieu's theory of practice to
overcome the identified challenges. This article seeks to bring together
these insights and show how a Bourdieusian perspective can inform and
contribute to the advancements in livelihoods research
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.