Purpose – Verify whether Ibovespa, Old or New, could be the best
alternative for investors, considering investment possibilities (risky and risk free) in the Brazilian market. Should investors put the portion of money that they allocate to risky assets into New Ibovespa? Are there more effi cient alternatives for investors?
Design/methodology/approach – Th e Portfolio T was determined
with the modern portfolio theory from a sample of 118 shares for 34 four-month periods. Equality of means and variance were tested by means of parametric and nonparametric tests, as appropriate.
Findings – Studying New Ibovespa (calculated retroactively) in the
period between January 1, 2003 and April 30, 2014, it was concluded that, (i) analyzing the entire period, (a) New Ibovespa was dominated by a portfolio obtained by applying the concepts of the modern portfolio theory (portfolio T), and (b) New Ibovespa dominated Old Ibovespa, and (ii) analyzing each of the 34 four-month periods individually, New Ibovespa was dominated by the portfolio T in 13 out of the 18 four-month periods in which there had been statistically signifi cant dominance (72,2% of all cases).
Originality/value – Th e paper contributes to the study of the New
Ibovespa, off ering 118 shares to determine the Portfolio T and for
a 34 four-month period. To the best knowledge of the authors, no
other paper studied the New Ibovespa. It can be concluded that, for the period analyzed, when compared to New Ibovespa, the portfolio T would have been a better investment alternative
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.