The simultaneous analysis of aerosol microphysical properties profiles at
different European stations is made in the framework of the ChArMEx/EMEP 2012
field campaign (9–11 July 2012). During and in support of this campaign,
five lidar ground-based stations (Athens, Barcelona, Bucharest, Évora,
and Granada) performed 72 h of continuous lidar measurements and collocated
and coincident sun-photometer measurements. Therefore it was possible to
retrieve volume concentration profiles with the Lidar Radiometer Inversion
Code (LIRIC). Results indicated the presence of a mineral dust plume
affecting the western Mediterranean region (mainly the Granada station),
whereas a different aerosol plume was observed over the Balkans area. LIRIC
profiles showed a predominance of coarse spheroid particles above Granada, as
expected for mineral dust, and an aerosol plume composed mainly of fine and
coarse spherical particles above Athens and Bucharest. Due to the exceptional
characteristics of the ChArMEx database, the analysis of the microphysical
properties profiles' temporal evolution was also possible. An in-depth
analysis was performed mainly at the Granada station because of the
availability of continuous lidar measurements and frequent AERONET inversion
retrievals. The analysis at Granada was of special interest since the station
was affected by mineral dust during the complete analyzed period. LIRIC was
found to be a very useful tool for performing continuous monitoring of
mineral dust, allowing for the analysis of the dynamics of the dust event in
the vertical and temporal coordinates. Results obtained here illustrate the
importance of having collocated and simultaneous advanced lidar and
sun-photometer measurements in order to characterize the aerosol
microphysical properties in both the vertical and temporal coordinates at a
regional scale. In addition, this study revealed that the use of the
depolarization information as input in LIRIC in the stations of Bucharest,
Évora, and Granada was crucial for the characterization of the aerosol
types and their distribution in the vertical column, whereas in stations
lacking depolarization lidar channels, ancillary information was needed.
Results obtained were also used for the validation of different mineral dust
models. In general, the models better forecast the vertical distribution of
the mineral dust than the column-integrated mass concentration, which was
underestimated in most of the cases
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.