Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information

By Hadas Shema, Judit Bar-Ilan and Mike Thelwall

Abstract

The research blog has become a popular mechanism for the quick discussion of scholarly information. However, unlike peer-reviewed journals, the characteristics of this form of scientific discourse are not well understood, for example in terms of the spread of blogger levels of education, gender and institutional affiliations. In this paper we fill this gap by analyzing a sample of blog posts discussing science via an aggregator called ResearchBlogging.org (RB). ResearchBlogging.org aggregates posts based on peer-reviewed research and allows bloggers to cite their sources in a scholarly manner. We studied the bloggers, blog posts and referenced journals of bloggers who posted at least 20 items. We found that RB bloggers show a preference for papers from high-impact journals and blog mostly about research in the life and behavioral sciences. The most frequently referenced journal sources in the sample were: Science, Nature, PNAS and PLoS One. Most of the bloggers in our sample had active Twitter accounts connected with their blogs, and at least 90% of these accounts connect to at least one other RB-related Twitter account. The average RB blogger in our sample is male, either a graduate student or has been awarded a PhD and blogs under his own name

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3350512
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2010). A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus. Science [online early access]. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/332/ 6034/1163.short. Accessed
    2. (2010). Alt-metrics: a manifesto. Available: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed
    3. (1981). An iterative technique for documentretrieval using descriptors and relations.
    4. (2010). Announcing PLoS Blogs. Available: http://blogs.plos.org/plos/ 2010/09/announcing-plos-blogs/. Accessed
    5. (2011). Arseniclife link collection. Blog Around the Clock. Available: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/a-blog-around-the-clock/2011/ 09/30/arseniclife-link-collection/. Accessed
    6. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference?
    7. (2011). Blog Network Launches on ScientificAmerican.com. Available: http://www.scientificamerican.com/pressroom/pr/release.cfm?site=sciam&date= 2011-07-05. Accessed
    8. (2009). Blogging evolution. Evolution: education and outreach (2):
    9. (2006). Blogging from inside the ivory tower.
    10. (2010). Blogging out of balance. Seed Magazine. Available at http:// seedmagazine.com/content/article/blogging_out_of_balance/. Accessed
    11. (1979). Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, Technology, and Humanities.
    12. (2011). Comment on ‘‘A Bacterium That Can Grow by Using Arsenic
    13. (2011). Dear newspapers: individual studies do not exist in a vacuum. Obesity Panacea.
    14. (2010). Death for ‘‘Arsenic-Based Life’’? Seed Magazine. Available: http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/death_for_arsenic-based_life/. Accessed
    15. (2010). Division of Science Resources Statistics (b) (2010) Science & engineering indicators:
    16. (2010). Fallout from Nasa’s ‘arsenic bacteria’.
    17. (2011). First-year graduate students just wasting time? Prevalence and use of Twitter among scholars.
    18. (2010). Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (a)
    19. (2010). Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (b)
    20. Ghosh R(2010) Wikipedia survey – overview of results.
    21. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter.
    22. (2007). How is science cited on the web? A classification of Google unique web citations.
    23. (2010). I am a blogging researcher: Motivations for blogging in a scholarly context.
    24. (2006). Ladle RJ
    25. (2010). Meet the New Wired Science All-Star Bloggers. Available at http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/09/new-wired-science-blogsnetwork/. Accessed
    26. (2010). NASA’s arsenic microbe science slammed.
    27. (2010). NodeXL: a free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010, http://nodexl.codeplex.com/from the Social Media Research Foundation,
    28. (2011). One hundred million voices. Available: http://blog.twitter.com/ 2011/09/one-hundred-million-voices.html. Accessed
    29. (2010). Rethinking the topic tags on Research Blogging. Available http://researchblogging.org/news/?p=1864. Accessed
    30. (2010). Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges and opportunities.
    31. (2011). Science publishing: The paper is not sacred.
    32. (2007). Scientists enter the blogosphere.
    33. (2010). Sources of health articles in Israeli news sites.
    34. (2010). Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study.
    35. (1999). The citation culture. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
    36. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication.
    37. (2010). The Guardian launches science blogs network. Available http:// www.themediabriefing.com/article/2010-08-31/the-guardian-launches-scienceblogs-network Accessed
    38. (1973). The normative structure of science.
    39. (1999). Uses of expertise: sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news.
    40. (2005). Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines.
    41. (2006). Who benefits from science blogging? Hypothesis 10–14.
    42. (2011). WP:Clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.