Article thumbnail

On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect



We report an extension of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect found by Howard, Nickels, Coltheart, and Cole-Virtue (2006). Using more sensitive statistical analyses, we found a significant variation in the magnitude of the effect across categories. This variation cannot be explained by the naming speed of each category. In addition, using a sub-sample of the data, a second cumulative effect arouse for newly-defined supra-categories, over and above the effect of the original ones. We discuss these findings in terms of the representations that drive lexical access, and interpret them as supporting featural or distributed hypotheses

Topics: Semantics, Cognitive Psychology, Psycholinguistics
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics.
  2. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife.
  3. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification.
  4. (2007). Conceptual structure.
  5. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies.
  6. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words.
  7. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R.
  8. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
  9. (2001). No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: Neuropsychological evidence and a computational model.
  10. (1997). On the nature and scope of feature representations of word meaning. doi
  11. (2002). Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. doi
  12. (2007). Semantic representation. doi
  13. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition.
  14. (2003). What are the facts of categoryspecific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence.