Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A critical re-evaluation of the regression model specification in the US D1 EQ-5D value function

By Kim Rand-Hendriksen, Liv A Augestad and Fredrik A Dahl
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3284414
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity
    2. (2005). Coons SJ: Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care
    3. (1996). et al: EuroQol: the current state of play. Health policy
    4. (2006). Group E: EQ-5D value sets: inventory, comparative review, and user guide
    5. (2009). International Comparisons in Valuing EQ-5D Health States: A Review and Analysis. Value Health
    6. (2007). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation Oxford:
    7. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care
    8. (2007). SJ: A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions. Med Decis Making
    9. (2005). SJ: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care
    10. (1989). Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.
    11. (2011). X: Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.