Article thumbnail

Multi-Media As a Cognitive Tool

By Dr Eshaa M. Alkhalifa

Abstract

Two of the modalities used to present information to students, namely, animation and verbal representation are in a constant competition in effectiveness, without any persistent winner, except when it comes to conceptual versus procedural knowledge. Here, we present an architecture that combines the two into a multi-media tutoring system. This system is tested and results indicate that combining the two media leads to a cognitive interaction that promotes student learning with no less than 40% from their post classical-classroom session levels. A test for individual differences indicates that this group is almost equally divided between those described as “spatially oriented” and those described as “verbally oriented”. Learning across the two types of learners does not show any significant differences, except with respect to one question. This implies that perhaps, the two media may have ambiguous internal factors that support each other. Additionally, individual learning styles does not seem to be a clear-cut division, and is instead a “preference” of one modality as a primary source of learning, not an only one

Topics: Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:5311

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). Assessing Dynamics in Computer-Based Instruction. In
  2. (1999). Cognitive tools for discovery learning.
  3. (1987). Dynamic Mental Representations.
  4. (1998). Effects of representation modality and thinking style on learning to solve reasoning problems,
  5. (1994). Empirically Evaluating the Use of Animation to Teach Algorithms .
  6. (1999). Evaluating animation as student aids in learning computer algorithms .
  7. (2002). Evaluating Multimedia Educational Software: The DAST Experience, Paper presented at the
  8. (1963). Kit of refe rence tests for cognitive factors,
  9. (1988). The design of everyday things,
  10. (2001). Why Re -Invent the Wheel? Insights from Cognitive Research on