Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Escalation Bias: Does It Extend to Marketing?

By J. Scott Armstrong, Nicole Coviello and Barbara Safranek

Abstract

Escalation bias implies that managers favor reinvestments in projects that are doing poorly over those doing well. We tested this implication in a marketing context by conducting experiments on advertising and product-design decisions. Each situation was varied to reflect either a long-term or a short-term decision. Besides these four conditions, we conducted three replications. We found little evidence of escalation bias by 365 subjects in the seven experimental comparisons

Topics: Behavioral Analysis
Year: 1993
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:5183

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1986). An appraisal of the use of student subjects in marketing research."
  2. (1989). An empirical test of Slaw and Ross's prescriptions for the management of escalation of commitment behavior in organizations,” Decision Sciences,
  3. (1986). Continuing investment under conditions of failure: A laboratory study of the limits to escalation,” doi
  4. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration: When sunk costs and negative feedback coincide,” doi
  5. (1976). Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effect on sales,”
  6. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, doi
  7. (1985). Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts.
  8. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment,” doi
  9. (1986). Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings. doi
  10. (1987). Information requests in the context of escalation,”
  11. (1982). Performance evaluation in a dynamic context: a laboratory study of the impact of a prior commitment to the rate,”
  12. (1951). Probability learning and negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols,” doi
  13. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. (1987). Student guinea pigs: Porcine predictors and particularistic phenomena,” doi
  15. (1980). Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: some evidence,"
  16. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress,”
  17. (1987). The escalation phenomenon reconsidered: Decision dilemmas or decision errors?”
  18. (1988). The impact of prospectively relevant information on persistence in a project following setbacks,”
  19. (1979). The trapped administrator: Effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action,” doi
  20. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.