Article thumbnail

Late Replicating Domains Are Highly Recombining in Females but Have Low Male Recombination Rates: Implications for Isochore Evolution

By Catherine J. Pink and Laurence D. Hurst

Abstract

In mammals sequences that are either late replicating or highly recombining have high rates of evolution at putatively neutral sites. As early replicating domains and highly recombining domains both tend to be GC rich we a priori expect these two variables to covary. If so, the relative contribution of either of these variables to the local neutral substitution rate might have been wrongly estimated owing to covariance with the other. Against our expectations, we find that sex-averaged recombination rates show little or no correlation with replication timing, suggesting that they are independent determinants of substitution rates. However, this result masks significant sex-specific complexity: late replicating domains tend to have high recombination rates in females but low recombination rates in males. That these trends are antagonistic explains why sex-averaged recombination is not correlated with replication timing. This unexpected result has several important implications. First, although both male and female recombination rates covary significantly with intronic substitution rates, the magnitude of this correlation is moderately underestimated for male recombination and slightly overestimated for female recombination, owing to covariance with replicating timing. Second, the result could explain why male recombination is strongly correlated with GC content but female recombination is not. If to explain the correlation between GC content and replication timing we suppose that late replication forces reduced GC content, then GC promotion by biased gene conversion during female recombination is partly countered by the antagonistic effect of later replicating sequence tending increase AT content. Indeed, the strength of the correlation between female recombination rate and local GC content is more than doubled by control for replication timing. Our results underpin the need to consider sex-specific recombination rates and potential covariates in analysis of GC content and rates of evolution

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3176772
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A highresolution single nucleotide polymorphism genetic map of the mouse genome.
  2. (2003). A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans.
  3. (2009). A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse.
  4. (1999). Ashworth A
  5. (2007). Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: the footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion.
  6. (2009). Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes.
  7. (2003). Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution.
  8. (2007). Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.
  9. (2002). Chromosome-wide assessment of replication timing for human chromosomes 11q and 21q: disease-related genes in timing-switch regions. Hum Mol Genet 11: 13–21. Sex-Specific Recombination and Replication Timing PLoS
  10. (2010). Comparative analysis of DNA replication timing reveals conserved large-scale chromosomal architecture.
  11. (2008). Comparative genome mapping of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) reveals greater similarity to rat (Rattus norvegicus) than to the lab mouse (Mus musculus).
  12. (2004). Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.
  13. (1988). Different base/base mispairs are corrected with different efficiencies and specificities in monkey kidney cells.
  14. (1962). Different Rates of Spontaneous Mutation during Mitosis and Meiosis in Yeast.
  15. (1995). DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair.
  16. (2009). Evidence that replication-associated mutation alone does not explain between-chromosome differences in substitution rates. Genome Biology and Evolution
  17. (2002). Evolutionary distance estimation under heterogeneous substitution pattern among lineages.
  18. (2002). Expected relationship between the silent substitution rate and the GC content: implications for the evolution of isochores.
  19. (2011). Extensive recombination rate variation in the house mouse species complex inferred from genetic linkage maps.
  20. (2005). Fine-scale recombination patterns differ between chimpanzees and humans.
  21. (2003). Functional constraints and frequency of deleterious mutations in noncoding DNA of rodents.
  22. (2009). GC content and recombination: Reassessing the causal effects for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.
  23. (2009). GC-biased gene conversion promotes the fixation of deleterious amino acid changes in primates.
  24. (2003). Genic mutation rates in mammals: local similarity, chromosomal heterogeneity, and X-versus-autosome disparity.
  25. (2010). Genomic signatures of germline gene expression.
  26. (2008). Global organization of replication time zones of the mouse genome.
  27. (2008). Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation.
  28. (2009). Hotspots of biased nucleotide substitutions in human genes.
  29. (2009). Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing.
  30. (2002). Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination.
  31. (2008). Human-macaque comparisons illuminate variation in neutral substitution rates.
  32. (2010). Impact of replication timing on non-CpG and CpG substitution rates in mammalian genomes.
  33. (2007). Isochores and replication time zones: a perfect match.
  34. (2003). LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.
  35. (2001). Local similarity in evolutionary rates extends over whole chromosomes in human-rodent and mouse-rat comparisons: implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the male mutation bias.
  36. (2005). Male-driven biased gene conversion governs the evolution of base composition in human alu repeats.
  37. (2002). Male-driven evolution.
  38. (1997). Molecular evolution - who is in the driver’s seat?
  39. (2009). Monoallelic expression and tissue specificity are associated with high crossover rates.
  40. (2011). Mutation rates across budding yeast Chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biology and Evolution,
  41. (1989). Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.
  42. (2004). Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome.
  43. (2004). Replication timing of the human genome.
  44. (2008). Replication timing, chromosomal bands, and isochores.
  45. (2008). ReplicationDomain: a visualization tool and comparative database for genomewide replication timing data.
  46. (2004). Similar rates but different modes of sequence evolution in introns and at exonic silent sites in rodents: evidence for selectively driven codon usage.
  47. (1999). Spontaneous mutation in man.
  48. (2002). Strong male-driven evolution of DNA sequences in humans and apes.
  49. (2011). Substitution patterns are under different influences in primates and rodents.
  50. (2008). The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome.
  51. (2007). The mouse genome database (MGD): new features facilitating a model system.
  52. (1963). The origin of spontaneous mutations during meiosis.
  53. (2005). The scale of mutational variation in the murid genome.
  54. (2004). The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool.
  55. (2010). Timing of replication is a determinant of neutral substitution rates but does not explain slow Y chromosome evolution in rodents.
  56. (2004). Transcription-coupled and splicing-coupled strand asymmetries in eukaryotic genomes.