Article thumbnail

Robust metrics for assessing the performance of different verbal autopsy cause assignment methods in validation studies

By Christopher JL Murray, Rafael Lozano, Abraham D Flaxman, Alireza Vahdatpour and Alan D Lopez
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3160921
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). A case study of using artificial neural networks for classifying cause of death from verbal autopsy.
  2. (1997). A review of data-derived methods for assigning causes of death from verbal autopsy data.
  3. (2010). A: Cause-of-death ascertainment for deaths that occur outside hospitals in Thailand: application of verbal autopsy methods. Population Health Metrics
  4. (2006). AD: Validation of verbal autopsy procedures for adult deaths in China.
  5. (2006). AD: Validity of verbal autopsy procedures for determining cause of death in Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health
  6. (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. 1 edition.
  7. (2003). Applying verbal autopsy to determine cause of death in rural Vietnam. Scand J Public Health Suppl
  8. (2006). Assessing a new approach to verbal autopsy interpretation in a rural Ethiopian community: the InterVA model. Bull World Health Organ
  9. (2000). Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview. Bioinformatics
  10. (2005). Axiomatic characterization of nonlinear homomorphic means.
  11. (2006). Creating and Validating an Algorithm to Measure AIDS Mortality in the Adult Population using Verbal Autopsy. PLoS Med
  12. (2005). Darmstadt GL: Evaluation of neonatal verbal autopsy using physician review versus algorithm-based cause-of-death assignment in rural Nepal. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol
  13. (2006). DV: Refining a probabilistic model for interpreting verbal autopsy data.
  14. (2001). Effect of misclassification of causes of death in verbal autopsy: can it be adjusted?
  15. (1971). Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations.
  16. (1992). How useful are verbal autopsies to estimate childhood causes of death? Health Policy and Planning
  17. (2003). HV: A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam. Scand J Public Health Suppl
  18. (1954). Kruskal WH: Measures of Association for Cross Classifications.
  19. (1999). LC: Diagnostic accuracy of physician review, expert algorithms and data-derived algorithms in adult verbal autopsies.
  20. Logic of Survey Analysis. 9 edition.
  21. (1983). Measures of association
  22. (2010). Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality:
  23. (2007). Raftery AE: Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation.
  24. (2011). SK: Adult mortality surveillance by routine health workers using a short verbal autopsy tool in rural north India.
  25. (2006). SPS: Validity of verbal autopsy in determining causes of adult deaths.
  26. (2010). T: Verbal autopsy can consistently measure AIDS mortality: a validation study in Tanzania and Zimbabwe.
  27. (2011). Tallo V: Population Health Metrics Research Consortium gold standard verbal autopsy validation study: design, implementation, and development of analysis datasets. Popul Health Metr
  28. (1997). The effect of different sensitivity, specificity and cause-specific mortality fractions on the estimation of differences in cause-specific mortality rates in children from studies using verbal autopsies.
  29. (2011). the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC): Direct estimation of cause-specific mortality fractions from verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr
  30. (2011). the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC): Performance of InterVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr
  31. (2011). the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC): Performance of physician-certified verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr
  32. (2011). the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC): Performance of the Tariff Method: validation of a simple additive algorithm for analysis of verbal autopsies. Popul Health Metr
  33. (2011). the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC): Random forests for verbal autopsy analysis: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr
  34. (2011). the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC): Simplified Symptom Pattern Method for verbal autopsy analysis: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr
  35. (1994). Verbal autopsies for adult deaths: issues in their development and validation.
  36. (2008). Verbal Autopsy Methods with Multiple Causes of Death. Statistical Science
  37. (2004). Verbal autopsy of 80,000 adult deaths in Tamilnadu, South India. BMC Public Health
  38. (2006). Verbal autopsy: current practices and challenges. Bull World Health Organ
  39. (2007). Yang G: Validation of the Symptom Pattern Method for Analyzing Verbal Autopsy Data. PLoS Med