Article thumbnail

Examining the Effects of One- and Three-Dimensional Spatial Filtering Analyses in Magnetoencephalography

By Sam Johnson, Garreth Prendergast, Mark Hymers and Gary Green


Spatial filtering, or beamforming, is a commonly used data-driven analysis technique in the field of Magnetoencephalography (MEG). Although routinely referred to as a single technique, beamforming in fact encompasses several different methods, both with regard to defining the spatial filters used to reconstruct source-space time series and in terms of the analysis of these time series. This paper evaluates two alternative methods of spatial filter construction and application. It demonstrates how encoding different requirements into the design of these filters has an effect on the results obtained. The analyses presented demonstrate the potential value of implementations which examine the timeseries projections in multiple orientations at a single location by showing that beamforming can reconstruct predominantly radial sources in the case of a multiple-spheres forward model. The accuracy of source reconstruction appears to be more related to depth than source orientation. Furthermore, it is shown that using three 1-dimensional spatial filters can result in inaccurate source-space time series reconstruction. The paper concludes with brief recommendations regarding reporting beamforming methodologies in order to help remove ambiguity about the specifics of the techniques which have been used

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex.
  2. (1999). A sensor-weighted overlappingsphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG.
  3. (2005). Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamic Physiological Systems.
  4. (1987). Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem.
  5. (1988). Beamforming: A versatile approach to spatial filtering.
  6. (2009). Can we observe collective neuronal activity from macroscopic aggregate signals?
  7. (2004). Commonalities and differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging.
  8. (2000). Differences between synthetic aperture
  9. (2001). Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.
  10. (1998). Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). In: Biomag.
  11. (2004). Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf). Neurol Clin Neurophysiol
  12. (1993). Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain.
  13. (2004). Marantz A
  14. (2008). MEG imaging of sensorimotor areas using inter-trial coherence in vibrotactile steady-state responses.
  15. (2011). Nonparametric statistical thresholding of baseline free MEG beamformer images.
  16. (2001). Signal processing in magnetoencephalography.
  17. (2010). Source Stability Index: a novel beamforming based localisation metric.
  18. (2006). Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event-related beamforming approach.
  19. (1997). Suzuki A
  20. (2010). Temporal dynamics of sinusoidal and nonsinusoidal amplitude modulation.
  21. (2003). The cerebral oscillatory network of parkinsonian resting tremor.