Article thumbnail

How the psychosocial context of clinical trials differs from usual care: A qualitative study of acupuncture patients

By Fiona Barlow, Clare Scott, Beverly Coghlan, Philippa Lee, Peter White, George T Lewith and Felicity L Bishop
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3127852
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A: Complementary/alternative medicine in chronic illness as informed self-care decision making.
  2. A: The discovery of grounded theory. In The discovery of grounded theory. Edited by: Glaser BG, Strauss A. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson;
  3. (2004). Acupuncture as a complex intervention: a holistic model.
  4. (2009). al: “Maybe I Made Up the Whole Thing": Placebos and Patients’ Experiences in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry
  5. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. 2 edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage;
  6. (2006). Beyond needling - therapeutic processes in acupuncture care: a qualitative study nested within a lowback pain trial.
  7. (1999). Bottorff JL: Decision making related to complementary therapies a process of regaining control. Patient Educ Couns
  8. (1999). Breast cancer survivors’ perceptions of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM): Making the decision to use or not to use. Qual Health Res
  9. (2005). Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture. BMJ
  10. (1983). Clinical trials Chichester:
  11. (2001). Developing a dynamic model of treatment perceptions.
  12. (1997). Elbourne D: Making sense of randomization; Responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med
  13. (2005). et al: Lay public’s understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment
  14. (2000). et al: Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users’ Guides to Patient Care. JAMA
  15. (2008). et al: What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ
  16. (2009). Forging a conviction” - Participants’ experiences of a western acupuncture randomized controlled trial
  17. (2000). Horwitz RI: Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
  18. (2001). Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. The Lancet
  19. (1998). JL: Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. BMJ
  20. (2005). Kaptchuk TJ: Patient expectations in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.
  21. (2008). Lewith GT: A Review of Psychosocial Predictors of Treatment Outcomes: What Factors Might Determine the Clinical Success of Acupuncture for Pain?
  22. (2011). Lewith GT: How Patients Choose Acupuncturists: A Mixed Methods Project.
  23. (2011). Lewith GT: Patients as healthcare consumers in the public and private sectors: A qualitative study of acupuncture in the UK.
  24. (2010). Lewith GT: Why consumers maintain complementary and alternative medicine use: A qualitative study.
  25. (2008). Playing their parts": The experiences of participants in a randomized sham-controlled acupuncture trial.
  26. (2002). Private complementary medicine and older people: service use and user empowerment. Ageing Soc
  27. (2010). Secretary of State for Health: Government response to the Science and Technology Committee report ‘Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy’. UK, The Stationery Office Limited;
  28. (2008). Self-help advice as a process integral to traditional acupuncture care: Implications for trial design. Complement Ther Med
  29. (2008). The patient’s experience of holistic care: insights from acupuncture research. Chronic Illness
  30. (1999). The role of expectancies in the placebo effect and their use in the delivery of health care: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment
  31. (1998). The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ
  32. (2009). Tooher R: Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian ‘levels of evidence’.
  33. (1998). Torgerson DJ: Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials? BMJ
  34. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: Randomisation methods in controlled trials. BMJ
  35. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ
  36. (2001). Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complement Ther Med
  37. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.