Article thumbnail

Re-Structuring of Marine Communities Exposed to Environmental Change: A Global Study on the Interactive Effects of Species and Functional Richness

By Martin Wahl, Heike Link, Nicolaos Alexandridis, Jeremy C. Thomason, Mauricio Cifuentes, Mark J. Costello, Bernardo A. P. da Gama, Kristina Hillock, Alistair J. Hobday, Manfred J. Kaufmann, Stefanie Keller, Patrik Kraufvelin, Ina Krüger, Lars Lauterbach, Bruno L. Antunes, Markus Molis, Masahiro Nakaoka, Julia Nyström, Zulkamal bin Radzi, Björn Stockhausen, Martin Thiel, Thomas Vance, Annika Weseloh, Mark Whittle, Lisa Wiesmann, Laura Wunderer, Takehisa Yamakita and Mark Lenz


Species richness is the most commonly used but controversial biodiversity metric in studies on aspects of community stability such as structural composition or productivity. The apparent ambiguity of theoretical and experimental findings may in part be due to experimental shortcomings and/or heterogeneity of scales and methods in earlier studies. This has led to an urgent call for improved and more realistic experiments. In a series of experiments replicated at a global scale we translocated several hundred marine hard bottom communities to new environments simulating a rapid but moderate environmental change. Subsequently, we measured their rate of compositional change (re-structuring) which in the great majority of cases represented a compositional convergence towards local communities. Re-structuring is driven by mortality of community components (original species) and establishment of new species in the changed environmental context. The rate of this re-structuring was then related to various system properties. We show that availability of free substratum relates negatively while taxon richness relates positively to structural persistence (i.e., no or slow re-structuring). Thus, when faced with environmental change, taxon-rich communities retain their original composition longer than taxon-poor communities. The effect of taxon richness, however, interacts with another aspect of diversity, functional richness. Indeed, taxon richness relates positively to persistence in functionally depauperate communities, but not in functionally diverse communities. The interaction between taxonomic and functional diversity with regard to the behaviour of communities exposed to environmental stress may help understand some of the seemingly contrasting findings of past research

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A new look at the relationship between diversity and stability.
  2. (2008). Beyond competition: Incorporating positive interactions between taxon to predict ecosystem invasibility.
  3. (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy.
  4. (2006). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: issues of scale and trophic complexity.
  5. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the emergence of a synthetic ecological framework.
  6. (2008). Biodiversity and persistence of ecological communities in variable environments.
  7. (2010). Biodiversity effects in real ecosystems - a response to Duffy.
  8. (2004). Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environments.
  9. (2005). Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation?
  10. (2010). Biomass, diversity and production of rocky shore macroalgae at two nutrient enrichment and wave action levels.
  11. (2005). Body size in ecological networks.
  12. (2001). Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions.
  13. (2008). Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: Reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments.
  14. (2009). Consequences of climate-driven biodiversity changes for ecosystem functioning of North European rocky shores.
  15. (2001). Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems.
  16. (2008). Consumer diversity enhances secondary production by complementarity effects in experimental ciliate assemblages. Estuaries and Coasts:
  17. (2010). Core Team
  18. (2010). Data Analysis and Graphics Using R – an Example-Based Approach. 3rd Edition.
  19. (2009). Disruption, succession and stochasticity.
  20. (2009). Disturbance, diversity and stability of ecological systems - the need for a uniform hypothesis.
  21. (2005). Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects.
  22. (2009). Diversity effects beyond species richness: evidence from intertidal macroalgal assemblages.
  23. (2008). Ecological lever and interface ecology: epibiosis modulates the interactions between host and environment.
  24. (2009). Ecological realism and mechanisms by which diversity begets stability.
  25. (2003). Ecosystem responses to global climate change: Moving beyond color mapping.
  26. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge.
  27. (2005). Effects of taxon and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties.
  28. (2006). Expanding scales in biodiversity-based research: challenges and solutions for marine systems.
  29. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists.
  30. (2009). Habitat characteristics and typical functional groups.
  31. (2000). Hector A
  32. (2004). Impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of taxon co-tolerance.
  33. (2004). Invasion rates increase with taxon richness in a marine epibenthic community by two mechanisms.
  34. (2005). Low functional redundancy in coastal marine assemblages.
  35. (2006). Marine biodiversity and ecosystem function: empirical approaches and future research needs - Introduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:
  36. (2006). Methods for describing ecological functioning of marine benthic assemblages using biological traits analysis (BTA).
  37. (2007). Microcosm experiments can inform global ecological problems.
  38. (2008). Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning.
  39. (2005). New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems.
  40. (2009). Observational evidence of a negative biodiversitystability relationship in intertidal epibenthic communities.
  41. (2004). On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient.
  42. (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services.
  43. (2009). Relative importance of biodiversity and the abiotic environment in mediating an ecosystem process.
  44. (2009). Seasonal dynamics.
  45. (2009). Settlement and Recruitment.
  46. (2008). Shrub invasion decreases diversity and alters community stability in Northern Chihuahuan desert plant communities.
  47. (2007). Stability and diversity of ecosystems.
  48. (1999). Taxon diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem.
  49. (2006). Taxon diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors.
  50. (1998). Taxon redundancy and ecosystem reliability.
  51. (2002). Taxon richness, environmental fluctuations, and temporal change in total community biomass.
  52. (2002). The debate on the role of biodiversity in ecosystem functioning.
  53. (2006). The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems.
  54. (1997). The larger area of the tropics does not explain latitudinal gradients in taxon diversity.
  55. (2009). The R book.
  56. (2007). Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems.
  57. (2007). What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers.
  58. (2009). Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems.