Article thumbnail

NMDA Receptors Are Not Required for Pattern Completion During Associative Memory Recall

By Bing Mei, Fei Li, Yiran Gu, Zhenzhong Cui and Joe Z. Tsien

Abstract

Pattern completion, the ability to retrieve complete memories initiated by subsets of external cues, has been a major focus of many computation models. A previously study reports that such pattern completion requires NMDA receptors in the hippocampus. However, such a claim was derived from a non-inducible gene knockout experiment in which the NMDA receptors were absent throughout all stages of memory processes as well as animal's adult life. This raises the critical question regarding whether the previously described results were truly resulting from the requirement of the NMDA receptors in retrieval. Here, we have examined the role of the NMDA receptors in pattern completion via inducible knockout of NMDA receptors limited to the memory retrieval stage. By using two independent mouse lines, we found that inducible knockout mice, lacking NMDA receptor in either forebrain or hippocampus CA1 region at the time of memory retrieval, exhibited normal recall of associative spatial reference memory regardless of whether retrievals took place under full-cue or partial-cue conditions. Moreover, systemic antagonism of NMDA receptor during retention tests also had no effect on full-cue or partial-cue recall of spatial water maze memories. Thus, both genetic and pharmacological experiments collectively demonstrate that pattern completion during spatial associative memory recall does not require the NMDA receptor in the hippocampus or forebrain

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3084823
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A distinct role for norepinephrine in memory retrieval.
  2. (1998). Abolition of long-term stability of new hippocampal place cell maps by NMDA receptor blockade.
  3. (2002). An emerging molecular and cellular framework for memory processing by the hippocampus.
  4. (2005). An investigation of retrieval inhibition in acute stress disorder.
  5. (2010). Balanced dopamine is critical for pattern completion during associative memory recall.
  6. (2006). CaMKII activation in the entorhinal cortex disrupts previously encoded spatial memory.
  7. (2000). Different hippocampal molecular requirements for short- and long-term retrieval of one-trial avoidance learning.
  8. (2006). Disconnection analysis of CA3 and DG in mediating encoding but not retrieval in a spatial maze learning task.
  9. (2005). Distinct contributions of hippocampal NMDA and AMPA receptors to encoding and retrieval of one-trial place memory.
  10. (1996). Early acquisition, but not retention, of the classically conditioned eyeblink response is N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dependent.
  11. (2000). Effect of a subanesthetic dose of ketamine on memory and conscious awareness in healthy volunteers.
  12. (2000). Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CA1 NMDAR1-knockout mice.
  13. (1999). Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice.
  14. (2007). Impaired spatial working memory but spared spatial reference memory following functional loss of NMDA receptors in the dentate gyrus.
  15. (2005). In search of memory traces.
  16. (2004). Inducible and reversible NR1 knockout reveals crucial role of the NMDA receptor in preserving remote memories in the brain.
  17. (2006). Insect olfactory memory in time and space.
  18. (1994). Involvement of hippocampal NMDA and AMPA receptors in acquisition, formation and retrieval of spatial memory in the Morris water maze.
  19. (2002). Mapping of olfactory memory circuits: region-specific c-fos activation after odor-reward associative learning or after its retrieval.
  20. (2002). Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories.
  21. (1991). Memory retrieval enhancement by locus coeruleus stimulation: evidence for mediation by beta-receptors.
  22. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. CambridgeMass.:
  23. (2004). Molecular and cellular cognition; the unraveling of memory retrieval.
  24. (2006). Molecular and systems mechanisms of memory consolidation and storage.
  25. (1997). NMDA receptor and the tyrosine phosphorylation of its 2B subunit in taste learning in the rat insular cortex.
  26. (2000). NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic reinforcement as a crucial process for memory consolidation.
  27. (1985). Noradrenergic modulation of selective attention: its role in memory retrieval.
  28. (2005). PI3 kinase signaling is required for retrieval and extinction of contextual memory.
  29. (2002). Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall.
  30. (2005). Requirement of NMDA receptor reactivation for consolidation and storage of nondeclarative taste memory revealed by inducible NR1 knockout.
  31. (2000). Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering.
  32. (2000). Reversible inactivation of the hippocampal mossy fiber synapses in mice impairs spatial learning, but neither consolidation nor memory retrieval, in the Morris navigation task.
  33. (1971). Simple memory: a theory for archicortex.
  34. (2006). Systems consolidation requires postlearning activation of NMDA receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex in trace eyeblink conditioning.
  35. (1996). The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory.
  36. (2004). The role of the dorsal hippocampus in the acquisition and retrieval of context memory representations.