Article thumbnail

Bonobos Extract Meaning from Call Sequences

By Zanna Clay and Klaus Zuberbühler

Abstract

Studies on language-trained bonobos have revealed their remarkable abilities in representational and communication tasks. Surprisingly, however, corresponding research into their natural communication has largely been neglected. We address this issue with a first playback study on the natural vocal behaviour of bonobos. Bonobos produce five acoustically distinct call types when finding food, which they regularly mix together into longer call sequences. We found that individual call types were relatively poor indicators of food quality, while context specificity was much greater at the call sequence level. We therefore investigated whether receivers could extract meaning about the quality of food encountered by the caller by integrating across different call sequences. We first trained four captive individuals to find two types of foods, kiwi (preferred) and apples (less preferred) at two different locations. We then conducted naturalistic playback experiments during which we broadcasted sequences of four calls, originally produced by a familiar individual responding to either kiwi or apples. All sequences contained the same number of calls but varied in the composition of call types. Following playbacks, we found that subjects devoted significantly more search effort to the field indicated by the call sequence. Rather than attending to individual calls, bonobos attended to the entire sequences to make inferences about the food encountered by a caller. These results provide the first empirical evidence that bonobos are able to extract information about external events by attending to vocal sequences of other individuals and highlight the importance of call combinations in their natural communication system

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3083404
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). A Consumer Based Teleosemantics for Animal Signals.
  2. (2010). A Study of Clustered Data and Approaches to Its Analysis.
  3. (2002). Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system.
  4. (1996). Campbell A
  5. (1999). Chicken food calls are functionally referential.
  6. (1999). Conceptual semantics in a nonhuman primate.
  7. (1995). Factors affecting the rates of food calls given by red-bellied tamarins.
  8. (1963). Feeding behaviour of wild chimpanzees: a preliminary report;
  9. (1996). Food calling in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus): an experiment.
  10. (1991). Food-associated calls correlate with food preferences in cotton-top tamarins.
  11. (1993). Food-associated calls in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): I. Socioecological factors.
  12. (2003). Food-associated calls of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) are functionally referential signals.
  13. (1993). Food-elicited vocalizations in golden lion tamarins: design features for representational communication.
  14. (1998). Functional referents and acoustic similarity: field playback experiments with rhesus monkeys.
  15. (2006). Functionally referential alarm calls in tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus mystax)–evidence from playback experiments.
  16. (1972). Generalized linear models.
  17. (1994). Kanzi. The ape at the brink of the human mind.
  18. (1993). Language comprehension in ape and child.
  19. (2006). Language evolution: compositional semantics in primate calls.
  20. (2009). Marmoset (Callithrix geoffroyi) food-associated calls are functionally referential.
  21. (2003). Meaning and emotion in animal vocalizations.
  22. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication.
  23. (2007). Motivation before meaning: motivational information encoded in meerkat alarm calls develops earlier than referential information.
  24. (1999). Omedes A
  25. (2010). Production of food-associated calls in wild chimpanzees is dependent on the composition of the audience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, In press.
  26. (2000). Quality, Quantity, Distribution and Audience Effects on Food Calling in Cotton-Top Tamarins.
  27. (2003). Referential signaling in non-human primates: Cognitive precursors and limitations for the evolution of language.
  28. (1992). Relation between food preference and foodelicited vocalizations in golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia).
  29. (2004). Responses of White-Faced Capuchins (Cebus capucinus) to Naturalistic and Experimentally Presented Food-Associated Calls.
  30. (2003). Signalers and receivers in animal communication.
  31. (1986). Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus).
  32. (2002). Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency.
  33. (1990). Symbols: Their communicative use, comprehension, and combination by bonobos (Pan paniscus).
  34. (2001). The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency.
  35. (2010). The central importance of information in studies of animal communication.
  36. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge:
  37. (1988). The communication repertoire of captive bonobos (Pan paniscus), compared to that of chimpanzees.
  38. (2004). The function of food-associated calls in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus, from the perspective of the signaller.
  39. (2009). What do animal signals mean?
  40. (2010). Why do gorillas make sequences of gestures?
  41. (2005). Zuberbu ¨hler K