Article thumbnail

Labour and Neonatal Outcome in Small for Gestational Age Babies Delivered Beyond 36+0 Weeks: A Retrospective Cohort Study

By K. E. Boers, J. A. M. van der Post, Ben W. J. Mol, J. M. M. van Lith and S. A. Scherjon

Abstract

Objective. Small for gestational age (SGA) is associated with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. At present, evidence on whether these pregnancies should be managed expectantly or by induction is lacking. To get insight in current policy we analysed data of the National Dutch Perinatal Registry (PRN). Methods. We used data of all nulliparae between 2000 and 2005 with a singleton in cephalic presentation beyond 36+0 weeks, with a birth weight below the 10th percentile. We analysed two groups of pregnancies: (I) with isolated SGA and (II) with both SGA and hypertensive disorders. Onset of labour was related to route of delivery and neonatal outcome. Results. Induction was associated with a higher risk of emergency caesarean section (CS), without improvement in neonatal outcome. For women with isolated SGA the relative risk of emergency CS after induction was 2.3 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.1 to 2.5) and for women with both SGA and hypertensive disorders the relative risk was 2.7 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.1). Conclusion. Induction in pregnancies complicated by SGA at term is associated with a higher risk of instrumental deliveries without improvement of neonatal outcome. Prospective studies are needed to determine the best strategy in suspected IUGR at term

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3066629
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). A .T .N .T i t a ,M .B .L a n d o n ,C .Y .S p o n ge ta l . ,“ T i m i n g of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes,” The New England
  2. (1994). C h a n g ,S .C .R o b s o n ,J .A .D .S p e n c e r ,a n dS .G a l l i v a n , “Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound,”
  3. (2003). Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births:
  4. (2001). Comparison study between induced and spontaneous term and preterm births of small-for-gestational-age neonates,”
  5. (2007). Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term:
  6. (2000). Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term,”
  7. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial,”
  8. (2003). Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset: a matched cohort study,”
  9. (2006). Intrauterine growth restriction at term: Induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study,”
  10. (2000). K r a m e r ,K .D e m i s s i e ,H .Y a n g ,R .W .P l a t t ,R .S a u v e ,a n d R. Liston, “The contribution of mild and moderate preterm birth to infant mortality,”
  11. (1999). M c i n t i r e ,S .L .B l o o m ,B .M .C a s e y ,a n dK .J .L e v e n o , “Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants,” New England
  12. (1990). M.S.Kramer ,M.Olivier ,F .H.McLean,D .M.W illis,andR.H. Usher, “Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome,”
  13. (2003). Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginalbirth aftercesarean delivery: a review of theliterature,”
  14. (1970). On intrauterine growth. The significance of prenatal care,”
  15. (1996). Perinataloutcomeofidiopathicsmall for gestational age pregnancies at term: the effect of antenatal diagnosis,”
  16. (1998). Preterm and term births of small for gestational age infants: a populationbased study of risk factors amongnulliparous women,”British JournalofObstetricsandGynaecology,vol.105,no.9,pp.1011– 1017,
  17. (1995). R o b e r t s ,K .J .L e v e n o ,J .E .S i d a wi ,M .J .L u c a s ,a n dM .A . Kelly, “Fetal acidemia associated with regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery,”
  18. Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionablebenefit fordiagnosed cases,”Acta Obstetricia etGynecologica Scandinavica,
  19. (1995). T o m a s h e k ,C .K .S h a p i r o - M e n d o z a ,M .J .D a v i d o ff,a n d
  20. (2001). The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from
  21. (2004). Uterine hyperstimulation followingcervixripeningwithdinoprostoneinavaginalinsert system,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde,vol.
  22. (2005). V r o u e n r a e t s