Article thumbnail

Survivorship of the KUDO total elbow prosthesis--comparative study of cemented and uncemented ulnar components: 89 cases followed for an average of 6 years.

By H.J. van der Heide, M.J. de Vos, J.M. Brinkman, D. Eygendaal, F.H.J. van den Hoogen and M.C. de Waal Malefijt

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Kudo total elbow prosthesis (TEP) is a well-established implant with good mid-term results. The ulnar component can be placed with or without cement, and the humeral component is normally placed without cement. METHODS: 89 Kudo type-5 total elbow prostheses were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 6 (1.7-11) years. The indication for joint replacement was rheumatoid arthritis in all cases. 49 prostheses were placed without cement. In 40 cases, the ulnar component was cemented and the humeral component was uncemented. RESULTS: In the uncemented group, 7 revisions had taken place. 3 of these ulnar components were shortstemmed and 4 were long-stemmed. No revisions had been performed in the hybrid group. In the uncemented group another 7 patients showed progressive radiolucencies, while 3 patients in the hybrid group showed progressive radiolucencies. INTERPRETATION: In this group of RA patients, the survivorship of the cemented ulnar component was better than that of the uncemented ulnar component

Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1080/17453670710013771
OAI identifier:
Provided by: NARCIS
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 (external link)
  • http://hdl.handle.net/2066/530... (external link)
  • http://hdl.handle.net/2066/530... (external link)
  • https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/d... (external link)
  • https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/b... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.