Article thumbnail

Extinction Debt in Source-Sink Metacommunities

By Nicolas Mouquet, Birte Matthiessen, Tom Miller and Andrew Gonzalez

Abstract

In an increasingly modified world, understanding and predicting the consequences of landscape alteration on biodiversity is a challenge for ecologists. To this end, metacommunity theory has developed to better understand the complexity of local and regional interactions that occur across larger landscapes. While metacommunity ecology has now provided several alternative models of species coexistence at different spatial scales, predictions regarding the consequences of landscape alteration have been done exclusively for the competition-colonization trade off model (CC). In this paper we investigate the effects of landscape perturbation on source-sink metacommunities. We show that habitat destruction perturbs the equilibria among species competitive effects within the metacommunity, driving both direct extinctions and an indirect extinction debt. As in CC models, we found a time lag for extinction following habitat destruction that varied in length depending upon the relative importance of direct and indirect effects. However, in contrast to CC models, we found that the less competitive species are more affected by habitat destruction. The best competitors can sometimes even be positively affected by habitat destruction, which corresponds well with the results of field studies. Our results are complementary to those results found in CC models of metacommunity dynamics. From a conservation perspective, our results illustrate that landscape alteration jeopardizes species coexistence in patchy landscapes through complex indirect effects and delayed extinctions patterns

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3050922
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (in press) Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecology Letters.
  2. (2000). A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments.
  3. (1995). Biodiversity and habitat destruction: a comparative study of model forest and coral reef ecosystems.
  4. (2009). Biodiversity as spatial insurance: the effects of habitat fragmentation and dispersal on ecosystem functioning.
  5. (1972). Biogeographic kinetics - Estimation of relaxation-times for avifaunas of southwest pacific islands.
  6. (1999). Choosing the the appopriate sacles of reserves for conservation.
  7. (2002). Coexistence in metacommunities: The regional similarity hypothesis.
  8. (2003). Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities.
  9. (2000). Community relaxation in fragmented landscapes: the relation between species, area and age.
  10. (1994). Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats.
  11. (2006). Consequences of varying regional heterogeneity in source-sink metacommunities: a mechanistic model.
  12. (2006). Corridor ecology: the science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation.
  13. (1980). Disturbance, coexistence, history and the competition for space.
  14. (1992). Dynamics of metapopulation: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence.
  15. (2001). Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments.
  16. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity.
  17. (1999). Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation.
  18. (1998). Evans-Freke I
  19. (2006). Extinction debt of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation.
  20. (2009). Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation.
  21. (1997). Extinction debts and risks faced by abundant species.
  22. (1996). Food web in space: An island biogeographic perspective.
  23. (2001). Habitat destruction and extinction in competitive and mutualistic metacommunities.
  24. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt.
  25. (1997). Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities.
  26. (1999). Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes.
  27. (1999). Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure?
  28. (2010). Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels.
  29. (2006). Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services.
  30. (2004). Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity.
  31. (1998). Lomolino MV
  32. (2003). Meta-ecosystem: a framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology.
  33. (1999). Metapopulation Ecology;
  34. (2000). On the relationship between niche and distribution.
  35. (1996). Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulation.
  36. (2006). Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation.
  37. (2010). Source and sink dynamics in meta-ecosystems.
  38. (2000). Source-sink population dynamics and the problem of siting marine reserves.
  39. (2008). Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs.
  40. (2001). Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics and the local coexistence of competing species.
  41. (2000). Species coexistence by permanent spatial heterogeneity in a lottery model.
  42. (2006). Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities.
  43. (2004). Species survival in fragmented landscapes: where to from here?
  44. (2010). Synchrony and stability of food webs in metacommunities.
  45. (2005). The effects of spatial processes on two species interactions.
  46. (2004). The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology.
  47. (2000). The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape.
  48. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography
  49. (2001). Towards a theoretical basis for ecosystem conservation.