Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Optimal control methods for simulating the perception of causality in young infants

By Matthew Schlesinger and Andrew Barto

Abstract

There is a growing debate among developmental theorists concerning the perception of causality in young infants. Some theorists advocate a top-down view, e.g., that infants reason about causal events on the basis of intuitive physical principles. Others argue instead for a bottom-up view of infant causal knowledge, in which causal perception emerges from a simple set of associative learning rules. In order to test the limits of the bottom-up view, we propose an optimal control model (OCM) of infant causal perception. OCM is trained to find an optimal pattern of eye movements for maintaining sight of a target object. We first present a series of simulations which illustrate OCM's ability to anticipate the outcome of novel, occluded causal events, and then compare OCM's performance with that of 9-month-old infants. The impications for developmental theory and research are discusse

Topics: Developmental Psychology, Perceptual Cognitive Psychology
Year: 1999
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:2701
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://cogprints.org/2701/2/co... (external link)
  • http://cogprints.org/2701/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1971). Development of the object concept as manifested in changes in the tracking behavior of infants between 7 and 20 weeks.
    2. (1990). Finding structure in time.
    3. (1990). Infant perception of a causal event. doi
    4. (1997). Infants’ understanding of physical phenomena: A perceptual hypothesis. Presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development,
    5. (1998). On perception of a partially occluded object in 6-month-olds.
    6. (1994). Physical reasoning in young infants: Seeking explanations for impossible events.
    7. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. doi
    8. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants.
    9. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks.
    10. (1991). Self-improvement based on reinforcement learning, planning, and teaching.
    11. (1993). The computational infant: Looking for developmental cognitive science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    12. (1979). The development of the young child’s ability to anticipate the outcomes of simple causal events.
    13. (1999). The drawbridge phenomenon: Representational reasoning or perceptual preference? doi
    14. (1982). The perception of causality in infants.
    15. (1992). What infants infer about hidden objects and events.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.