Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Better data for teachers, better data for learners, better patient care: college-wide assessment at Michigan State University's College of Human Medicine

By Aron C. Sousa, Dianne P. Wagner, Rebecca C. Henry and Brian E. Mavis

Abstract

When our school organized the curriculum around a core set of medical student competencies in 2004, it was clear that more numerous and more varied student assessments were needed. To oversee a systematic approach to the assessment of medical student competencies, the Office of College-wide Assessment was established, led by the Associate Dean of College-wide Assessment. The mission of the Office is to ‘facilitate the development of a seamless assessment system that drives a nimble, competency-based curriculum across the spectrum of our educational enterprise.’ The Associate Dean coordinates educational initiatives, developing partnerships to solve common problems, and enhancing synergy within the College. The Office also works to establish data collection and feedback loops to guide rational intervention and continuous curricular improvement. Aside from feedback, implementing a systems approach to assessment provides a means for identifying performance gaps, promotes continuity from undergraduate medical education to practice, and offers a rationale for some assessments to be located outside of courses and clerkships. Assessment system design, data analysis, and feedback require leadership, a cooperative faculty team with medical education expertise, and institutional support. The guiding principle is ‘Better Data for Teachers, Better Data for Learners, Better Patient Care.’ Better data empowers faculty to become change agents, learners to create evidence-based improvement plans and increases accountability to our most important stakeholders, our patients

Topics: Performance Assessment
Publisher: Medical Education Online
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3022704
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2010). Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/home/home. asp [cited 28
  2. (2010). Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/assess/Toolbox. pdf [cited 7
  3. (2010). and the College of Human Medicine Competence Committee. The College of Human Medicine Competence Committee: validation becomes valueadded.
  4. (2004). Assessing residents’ competencies at baseline; identifying the gaps. Acad Med
  5. (2009). Centralized assessment in graduate medical education: cents and sensibilities.
  6. (2011). Development of a preceptor tool to help students learn diagnostic reasoning.
  7. (2006). Gateway assessments of medical students for program development, ‘Really Good Stuff.’ Med Educ
  8. (1999). Med School Objectives Writing Group. Learning objectives for medical student education guidelines for medical schools: Report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Academic Medicine
  9. (2010). New Horizons in Medical Education conference proceedings. Available from: http://ama-assn-media.org/AMC-Conference 2010/intro.mp3 [cited 3
  10. (2010). System-wide implementation of a medication error curriculum in a community-based family medicine clerkship.
  11. (2010). Teaching students to think like doctors: development of a hands-on remediation curriculum in diagnostic reasoning.
  12. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med
  13. (2008). The CEO’s first column: the next step in the outcomes-based accreditation project.
  14. (2004). Using a formative simulated patient exercise for curriculum evaluation. BMC Med Educ

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.