Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Language discrimination by newborns: Teasing apart phonotactic, rhythmic, and intonational cues

By Franck Ramus


Speech rhythm has long been claimed to be a useful bootstrapping cue in the very first steps of language acquisition. Previous studies have suggested that newborn infants do categorize varieties of speech rhythm, as demonstrated by their ability to discriminate between certain languages. However, the existing evidence is not unequivocal: in previous studies, stimuli discriminated by newborns always contained additional speech cues on top of rhythm. Here, we conducted a series of experiments assessing discrimination between Dutch and Japanese by newborn infants, using a speech resynthesis technique to progressively degrade non-rhythmical properties of the sentences. When the stimuli are resynthesized using identical phonemes and artificial intonation contours for the two languages, thereby preserving only their rhythmic and broad phonotactic structure, newborns still seem to be able to discriminate between the two languages, but the effect is weaker than when intonation is present. This leaves open the possibility that the temporal correlation between intonational and rhythmic cues might actually facilitate the processing of speech rhythm

Topics: Cognitive Psychology, Developmental Psychology, Phonology, Perceptual Cognitive Psychology, Psycholinguistics
Publisher: John Benjamins
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1975). A course in phonetics.
    2. (1967). Elements of general phonetics.
    3. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion?
    4. (1998). Faster orientation latencies toward native language in two-month old infants.
    5. (1993). How do four-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances?
    6. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.
    7. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language.
    8. (1995). Morae and syllables: Rhythmical basis of speech representations in neonates.
    9. (2001). New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition.
    10. (1997). Nonnutritive sucking and sentence processing.
    11. (1986). Perception of syllable timing by prebabbling infants.
    12. (1987). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm.
    13. (1993). Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception.
    14. (2000). Quantitative characterisations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English.
    15. (1977). Rhythm perception in early infancy.
    16. (1992). Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    17. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed.
    18. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants.
    19. (1997). The discovery of spoken language.
    20. (1996). The MBROLA Project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for non-commercial purposes.
    21. (1993). The periodicity bias.
    22. (1982). The state of the state of the art. In
    23. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings.
    24. (1995). The syllable in phonological theory. In

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.