Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Partial report: Iconic store or two buffers?

By Siu L. Chow

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Selective recall of a subset of letters from a multiletter array declines systematically with increases in the delay of the partial report cue. The issues addressed were (a) whether such a decline is due to progressive loss of location information or to systematic loss of features and (b) whether partial report is the result of a select-then-identify or an identify-then-select process. Instructing the subjects to guess or not to guess had an effect of array, displacement, and extra-array errors. Emphasizing on recall location affected both intra- and extra-array errors. The interstimulus interval manipulation had an effect on extra-array errors as well as on intra-array errors. These observations are contrary to the suggestions that intra-array errors are due to loss of location information and that extra-array errors are indicative of a joint effect on misidentification due to chance and the ratio of extra-array errors to intra-array errors. Some other results are difficult for a dual-buffer model but can readily be accounted for by the orthodox view of the iconic store. THE INITIAL STAGE OF VISUAL PERCEPTION is generally characterized as a transient veridical representation. Some investigators have suggested that only sensory, noncategorical information such as location, shape, color, and size are available in the transient representation (Haber, 1969; Neisser, 1967; Sperling, 1960). Selective recall is achieved by choosing some parts of the veridical representation for further processing on the basis of sensory information (e.g., Sperling, 1960; Turvey & Kravetz, 1970; von Wright, 1968). This position is called the "select-then-identify" view

Topics: Cognitive Psychology
Year: 1991
DOI identifier: 10.1080/00221309.1991.9711140
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:2189

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1967). Cognitive psychology.
  2. (1976). Concurrent memory load and the rate of readout from iconic memory.
  3. (1967). Familiarity of letter sequences, response uncertainty, and the tachistoscopic recognition experiment.
  4. (1987). Iconic memory or icon?
  5. (1986). Iconic memory, location information, and partial report.
  6. (1988). Iconic memory," location information, and the bar-probe task: A reply to Chow.
  7. (1975). Iconic memory: A reply to Professor Holding.
  8. (1985). Iconic store and partial report.
  9. (1981). Identification, localization, and "iconic memory": An evaluation of the bar-probe task.
  10. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science.
  11. (1987). Information stores and mechanisms: Early stages of visual processing. In
  12. (1980). On familiarity effects in visual information processing.
  13. (1978). Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect.
  14. (1987). Science, ecological validity, and experimentation.
  15. (1980). Selection from visual persistence by perceptual groups and category membership.
  16. (1961). Short-term memory in visicon.
  17. (1975). The effect of a subsidiary task on iconic memory.
  18. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.
  19. (1976). The psychology of memory.
  20. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.