Article thumbnail

Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses

By Horst M. Mueller, Jonathan W. King and Marta Kutas

Abstract

Sentence-length event-related potential (ERP) waveforms were obtained from 23 scalp sites as 24 subjects listened to normally spoken sentences of various syntactic structures. The critical materials consisted of 36 sentences each containing one of 2 types of relative clauses that differ in processing difficulty, namely Subject Object (SO) and Subject Subject (SS) relative clauses. Sentence-length ERPs showed several differences in the slow scalp potentials elicited by SO and SS sentences that were similar in their temporal dynamics to those elicited by the same stimuli in a word-by-word reading experiment, although the effects in the two modalities have non identical distributions. Just as for written sentences, there was a large, fronto-central negativity beginning at the linguistically defined "gap" in the SO sentences; this effect was largest for listeners with above-median comprehension rates, and is hypothesized to index changes in on-line processing demands during comprehension

Topics: Syntax, Neurolinguistics, Psycholinguistics
Year: 1997
DOI identifier: 10.1016/s0926-6410(96)00070-5
OAI identifier: oai:cogprints.org:2084
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://cogprints.org/2084/3/13... (external link)
  • http://cogprints.org/2084/ (external link)

  • To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

    Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (1983). A method of obtaining measures of local parsing complex .ity throughout sentences,
    2. (1992). Attention and sentence processing deficits in Parkinson’s disease: .the role of anterior cingulate cortex,
    3. (1992). Auditory processing of speech. In:
    4. Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies,
    5. (1989). Dynamics: Progress and Perspecti˝es,
    6. (1996). EEG coherences within the 13–18 Hz band as correlates of a distinct lexical organization of concrete .and abstract nouns in humans, doi
    7. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, .morphological and syntactic violations,
    8. (1996). Event-related potential analyses of temporal disruptions in written and spoken .sentences,
    9. (1992). Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic proper .ties of terminal words in sentences,
    10. (1981). Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences,
    11. (1994). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human prefrontal cortex activation dur( )ing a spatial working memory task,
    12. (1996). Getting it Right: the Cogniti˝e Neuroscience of Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension, Erlbaum,
    13. (1988). Hemispheric processing of affective and linguistic intonation contours in normal .subjects, doi
    14. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic process .ing: the role of working memory,
    15. (1978). Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, doi
    16. (1993). N4 to spoken sentences in young and older subjects, doi
    17. (1991). Natural speech processing: an analysis using event-related brain potentials, Psychobiology,
    18. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials,
    19. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: event-re .lated brain potential investigations. In:
    20. (1987). Slow negative potential shifts indicating verbal cognitive learning in a concept formation task,
    21. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phe .nomenon,
    22. (1996). The potentials for basic sentence processing: differentiating integrative processes. In: I. Ikeda and J.L.
    23. (1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in doi
    24. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative
    25. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in
    26. (1995). Who did what and when? Using wordand clause-related ERPs to monitor working memory usage in .reading,